"I don't need the church to protect me from its abusive god."
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:22 pm
I've been looking for exactly the right thing to say should someone ask me why I no longer attend. (Not that this will ever happen.) "I don't need the church to protect me from its abusive god" is a top contender.
I think it explains a lot about the church and the behavior of its leaders. There's a lot of meaning to unpack, though, which is best done by analogy.
Let's say you're growing up in a large family with a father that you think of as strict - but if you're honest with yourself, there's more to it than that. He's cut some of his adult children out of his will for marrying below their social class. He withholds love and support if you don't do things his way, but says you're rejecting him. He calls you dirty when you disobey him and gives you the silent treatment. He makes it clear that he will not associate with you if you don't follow the plan he laid out for you at birth. He requires you to talk about how great he is and how he's always right, and you do it because he's a powerful man, and because he's your dad.
His go-to statement when any kid protests too much is, "I made you, so I can tell you exactly what to do." Another favorite is, "You're nothing without me."
You're just a kid. Aren't all families like this? How could you ever know differently? So, partly for self-protection and partly from ignorance, you internalize his attitudes. For example, you actually believe that you're dirty when you disobey him, and use disgust and shame to try to motivate obedience in the future.
Now, Dad is often gone, so Mom is usually the one dealing with kids. She has a dual role. Like you, she has internalized his attitudes, so she acts as an enforcer on his behalf. But she recognizes that his punishments are harsh, so she also acts as a protector.
She usually protects you by controlling your behavior so you don't incur his wrath. She's unwilling to extend his full punishments, so she uses the most potent weapons she's got: disgust and shame. "Think of how you'll feel when your wonderful, perfect dad gets home and sees you wallowing in filth. What makes you think you can hide it from him?"
There are regular check-ups to make sure you're sticking to the plan. She shames you in front of everyone if you get too far off. She doesn't respect reasonable boundaries. She can't risk you wandering too far off course. She might lose you like she lost a couple of older siblings who your dad disowned when they drifted away and then called him out on his manipulation.
I think it's obvious that Dad represents the Mormon god, and Mom represents the Q15.
There's a lot going on with the Q15's stubborn refusal to critically examine abusive practices like worthiness interviews, lifting up exactly one "ideal" kind of family, and sacrificing anyone and anything to maintain authority. Yes, there's arrogance and a self-aggrandizing need to believe that previous leaders were inspired. But I think they genuinely care, and that they pull a lot of this bullshit out of a misguided attempt to protect us from the abusive god they worship.
I think it explains a lot about the church and the behavior of its leaders. There's a lot of meaning to unpack, though, which is best done by analogy.
Let's say you're growing up in a large family with a father that you think of as strict - but if you're honest with yourself, there's more to it than that. He's cut some of his adult children out of his will for marrying below their social class. He withholds love and support if you don't do things his way, but says you're rejecting him. He calls you dirty when you disobey him and gives you the silent treatment. He makes it clear that he will not associate with you if you don't follow the plan he laid out for you at birth. He requires you to talk about how great he is and how he's always right, and you do it because he's a powerful man, and because he's your dad.
His go-to statement when any kid protests too much is, "I made you, so I can tell you exactly what to do." Another favorite is, "You're nothing without me."
You're just a kid. Aren't all families like this? How could you ever know differently? So, partly for self-protection and partly from ignorance, you internalize his attitudes. For example, you actually believe that you're dirty when you disobey him, and use disgust and shame to try to motivate obedience in the future.
Now, Dad is often gone, so Mom is usually the one dealing with kids. She has a dual role. Like you, she has internalized his attitudes, so she acts as an enforcer on his behalf. But she recognizes that his punishments are harsh, so she also acts as a protector.
She usually protects you by controlling your behavior so you don't incur his wrath. She's unwilling to extend his full punishments, so she uses the most potent weapons she's got: disgust and shame. "Think of how you'll feel when your wonderful, perfect dad gets home and sees you wallowing in filth. What makes you think you can hide it from him?"
There are regular check-ups to make sure you're sticking to the plan. She shames you in front of everyone if you get too far off. She doesn't respect reasonable boundaries. She can't risk you wandering too far off course. She might lose you like she lost a couple of older siblings who your dad disowned when they drifted away and then called him out on his manipulation.
I think it's obvious that Dad represents the Mormon god, and Mom represents the Q15.
There's a lot going on with the Q15's stubborn refusal to critically examine abusive practices like worthiness interviews, lifting up exactly one "ideal" kind of family, and sacrificing anyone and anything to maintain authority. Yes, there's arrogance and a self-aggrandizing need to believe that previous leaders were inspired. But I think they genuinely care, and that they pull a lot of this bullshit out of a misguided attempt to protect us from the abusive god they worship.