Reed Smoot, Utah's first senator

Discussions toward a better understanding of LDS doctrine, history, and culture. Discussion of Christianity, religion, and faith in general is welcome.
Post Reply
User avatar
Spicy McHaggis
Posts: 290
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:14 pm

Reed Smoot, Utah's first senator

Post by Spicy McHaggis »

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... erica.html

Some interesting facts I had never heard:
Still many Protestants—and early feminists—considered Mormons “moral lepers.” More than 3 million people signed petitions encouraging what became a two-year Senate investigation into whether Mormonism imposed “an obligation of hostility to the United States.”
I know from 1847 until his death Brigham Young HATED the US Government. He believed the Mormons would convert the Native Americans in the west who would then join forces to overthrow the US Government which would usher in the 2nd Coming and open up Missouri for Jesus's world rule.

If you read the article Smoot had some protectionist similarities with Trump and ended up being booted during the New Deal ear.
User avatar
Not Buying It
Posts: 1308
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:29 pm

Re: Reed Smoot, Utah's first senator

Post by Not Buying It »

Spicy McHaggis wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2017 9:54 am http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... erica.html

Some interesting facts I had never heard:
Still many Protestants—and early feminists—considered Mormons “moral lepers.” More than 3 million people signed petitions encouraging what became a two-year Senate investigation into whether Mormonism imposed “an obligation of hostility to the United States.”
I know from 1847 until his death Brigham Young HATED the US Government. He believed the Mormons would convert the Native Americans in the west who would then join forces to overthrow the US Government which would usher in the 2nd Coming and open up Missouri for Jesus's world rule.

If you read the article Smoot had some protectionist similarities with Trump and ended up being booted during the New Deal ear.



My understanding is that the "Oath of Vengeance" that was once part of the temple ceremony could probably be considered an "obligation of hostility":
You and each of you do covenant and promise that you will pray and never cease to pray to Almighty God to avenge the blood of the prophets upon this nation, and that you will teach the same to your children and to your children's children unto the third and fourth generation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_vengeance
"The truth is elegantly simple. The lie needs complex apologia. 4 simple words: Joe made it up. It answers everything with the perfect simplicity of Occam's Razor. Every convoluted excuse withers." - Some guy on Reddit called disposazelph
User avatar
fh451
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 4:28 pm

Re: Reed Smoot, Utah's first senator

Post by fh451 »

Spicy McHaggis wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2017 9:54 amIf you read the article Smoot had some protectionist similarities with Trump and ended up being booted during the New Deal ear.
In fact, he was the Smoot of the "Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act" of 1930.

fh451
User avatar
Enoch Witty
Posts: 297
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 11:14 am

Re: Reed Smoot, Utah's first senator

Post by Enoch Witty »

Not Buying It wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2017 10:47 am My understanding is that the "Oath of Vengeance" that was once part of the temple ceremony could probably be considered an "obligation of hostility":
You and each of you do covenant and promise that you will pray and never cease to pray to Almighty God to avenge the blood of the prophets upon this nation, and that you will teach the same to your children and to your children's children unto the third and fourth generation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_vengeance
I keep learning about more and more changes to the temple over the last 170 years. Sure is a lot of revision for something that is supposed to be eternally true. [I hate the temple so much.]
Post Reply