Let me know if you want anything else moved or removed.Wonderment wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2023 3:10 am I think it's perfectly understandable that people seeking a new life away from the control and dominion of the church, will look for new ideas of acceptance and tolerance towards people they were formerly taught to shun.
So, further discussion of politics should be moved to the coffee shop. JMO -- Wndr.
I can see your point. And I can respectfully disagree. I am not sure that a both-sides rebuttal is more persuasive than a whatabout question, even a rhetorical one like mine.Wonderment wrote: ↑Tue Aug 15, 2023 3:10 amNo, I do not. I do not think there is any moral equivalent between any of these people and Donald Trump. In fact, there is no moral equivalent between Donald Trump and any U.S. President in American history. You cannot "both sides" a man who calls for the termination of the U.S. Constitution. You cannot "both sides" a man who insists that he won an election by millions of votes when there is no evidence whatsoever of that.Do you acknowledge that Clinton, Biden and Rachel Maddow are polarizing too? If I said that you were just another folk that places Gavin Newsom as more in tune with God’s will would you find that position credible?
You cannot "both sides" a man who creates intense tribalism by railing against women, people of color, LGBT people, or anyone who disagrees with him. His bias is the same as the First Presidency. There is only one way to believe, one true prophet, and everyone else is condemned to outer darkness.
In 15 years here, I have never said ONE WORD about politics. But since you bring it up, let's address it head on. First of all, I like the penguin. I like his whimsical humor and his gentle observations on the world. He kindly points out racism and sexism when he sees it. I don't want a message board where intolerance is promoted towards women, LGBT people, people of color, gentiles, or anyone else to whom the First Presidency is opposed.
I don't want an internet version of the prejudices of the church or the conspiracy theories of the church. I don't want to have to tolerate people who believe that women are inferior, that they are property of their husbands, that their place is to be smiling, submissive subservient, and locked in the home while their husband orders them around.
That polarization and divisiveness is what we left behind.
I don't think you can "both sides" an issue, when one side works 24/7 to gin up as much rage and hatred about conspiracies as possible, then announces that Biden and Clinton are polarizing. There's only one side that fomented a violent rebellion against our U.S. Capitol, which we all watched on television. There's only one side that continues to push the conspiracy theory of a stolen election despite ZERO evidence.
I do not think there has been an acknowledgement that there is anything polarizing about Clinton, Biden or Maddow. I do not think that Moksha, Cns1, or anyone else, would find credible the accusation that Gavin Newsom's supporters or adherents believe that Newsom is more in touch with God's will. In fact, your response is that both sides, or a comparison, is not relevant so you also avoided acknowledging the quoted question and responding to it.
If by chance, you get to know my style and concerns more, you will come to find that I am not much interested in defending Trump. Hell, I am not even a registered voter anymore, despite a lifelong interest in politics. My grandmother who helped raise me was appointed by JFK to lead a federal office and was a delegate for the Democrats. She knew these players well and there were many Democrat leaders at her funeral. I watched many election nights on TV in her home. I remember her calling me while I was in college and telling me about the Gores and the Doles. This topic has been a passion for most of my life - and yet, under these conditions, I will not vote. I will not register to vote.
Blast Trump all you want. Good with me. I could not give less of a *****. Apologize for Biden and Clinton, great. Have a great time. Whatabout and block the both-er side. Coolio. I got it. All good. I have no intention of dissuading you or persuading you.
But.....
^^^^^^^ is not a comment about Trump, that is a comment about "these folks." I am interested in these folks. I might even like one of them. I know this, I damn sure can learn something from one or more of them. That I know because I am just a guy who don't know **** about ****.