Harmony Pennsylvania and Joseph's Seer Ability
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:06 am
At my ward yesterday we had a couple speak who had just returned from a mission to the Harmony, Pennsylvania Church site. I was fascinated to hear the new narrative about the Book of Mormon translation. In a nutshell: God guided Joseph to find a seer stone. He was able to develop his spiritual gift helping people find lost items, he used the stone and Nephite interpreters interchangeably as he translated the Book of Mormon. I was amazed that the speaker said that the only time we ever know of Joseph using the plates was to copy the characters. He said that someone had asked Elder Uchdorf (when he was visiting the site with a grandson) why the plates were needed if they weren't used. His response was that Joseph needed concrete evidence of the reality of the work.
I applaud the Church trying to be more accurate in the historical narrative (acknowledging the seer stone, the plates weren't used, etc.). I also recognize that there needs to be some spin to make this faith promoting since it is a Church site. I think using the Nephite interpreters/seer stone interchangeably is problematic because there is no history to support this. We only have a few instances where Joseph said anything about the interpreters and this position is a transitional one to the seer stone narrative. The rest of the new narrative begs tough questions, which is why we avoided it at all costs before. If Joseph was a talented seer, what lost items did he find? Why did people go through great trouble to engrave the plates, keep them safe, etc. if it was just a prop for Joseph to see it was real? Also, what about the 1826 trial and that using stones to find treasure was a common scam at the time?
The only instances I have read about where Joseph found items were: 1. Finding Martin Harris' toothpick in the hay in the barn; 2. Finding the tail feather while digging for a chest; 3. Describing the buildings and farm of Josiah Stowell; and 4. "Reading" the book with his back to it while looking at the stone.
All of these would be easily done with some prep work beforehand and were slight of hand tricks to prove credibility. Are there any other instances where he used the stone successfully or found anything?
I applaud the Church trying to be more accurate in the historical narrative (acknowledging the seer stone, the plates weren't used, etc.). I also recognize that there needs to be some spin to make this faith promoting since it is a Church site. I think using the Nephite interpreters/seer stone interchangeably is problematic because there is no history to support this. We only have a few instances where Joseph said anything about the interpreters and this position is a transitional one to the seer stone narrative. The rest of the new narrative begs tough questions, which is why we avoided it at all costs before. If Joseph was a talented seer, what lost items did he find? Why did people go through great trouble to engrave the plates, keep them safe, etc. if it was just a prop for Joseph to see it was real? Also, what about the 1826 trial and that using stones to find treasure was a common scam at the time?
The only instances I have read about where Joseph found items were: 1. Finding Martin Harris' toothpick in the hay in the barn; 2. Finding the tail feather while digging for a chest; 3. Describing the buildings and farm of Josiah Stowell; and 4. "Reading" the book with his back to it while looking at the stone.
All of these would be easily done with some prep work beforehand and were slight of hand tricks to prove credibility. Are there any other instances where he used the stone successfully or found anything?