The next step of my faith transition
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2018 12:21 pm
This is not my usual username. It's based on an improv game I played a few months ago. Point is, I want to remain anonymous-ish right now. I have been on another lds forum working through my faith crisis and I have more or less concluded at this point that I don't believe and I'm probably on my way out of the church. I guess I'm at the point where I need to apply an additional layer of cynicism or something. This forum seemed like the next logical step in my faith transition. I've been lurking for about a week now, but I knew this forum existed about 6 years ago. I thought it was strange at the time because I couldn't wrap my mind around the idea of staying in the church purely for family reasons. It makes sense to me now.
I was born and raised in the church. I'm in my mid 20s and single, so there is really nothing tying me down, so the only reason I would really want to stay in the church is if I could find some level of belief that I find comfortable. I suspect that isn't going to happen and even though I promised my best friend and parents I'd read the BoM and a book by the Givens' before I finalize my leaving, it feels like a fool's errand at this point. I no longer trust the church leadership and even though there are some good things here and there, I feel like it's a net negative. I have no plans to have my name removed, but that may change if the church continues to defend sexual predators and excommunicate scholars and "apostates."
While my FC wasn't in full swing until about 7 months ago, my doubts can be traced back at least 6 years ago in debates with an atheist online. I backed up to the apologetics and put things on my shelf. I shrugged it off and then went on a stateside mission. It was an overall good experience which helped me to become the man I am today, but I dealt with a lot of depression and anxiety trying to live up to the impossible mission standards. It took me about a year to finally get over my disobedient points and forgive myself. Depression runs in my family, so it would be unfair to blame that on the church, but it certainly didn't do much to help and may have actually contributed to it. But I took it all very seriously.
I never cared for going to the temple. My first time through completely freaked me out. If they were still doing the blood oaths, I would have left the church right there and then. I sorta got over that, but there are still things that bother me, like the veils and general sexism. (For instance, the temple video fails the Bechdel test)
I'm pretty intelligent. I knew my stuff. I knew a lot of docrinal things and quite a lot of the nicer parts of church history. I noticed that people didn't really know or care about any of those things. Church members don't understand grace, for instance. I don't forget facts easily, so it never made sense to me why you supposedly needed to keep reading the scriptures and stuff to maintain a testimony. It always looked a bit suspicious- like brainwashing.
Historical things in the church were never really a big deal to me. BY was a racist? Eh. Easy to shrug off. The brethren thought it was revelation and were very conservative with repealing the priesthood ban. JS used a stone in a hat to translate? Sure, whatever. Even coming to the conclusion that the BoM probably wasn't historical (I'm now 99.9% sure of that) wasn't a big deal to me because it didn't need to be historical to be the word of God (now I don't believe that either because it's actually quite coercive and spiritually manipulative). OTOH, the history of tithing and BY's self-exemption from it rubbed me the wrong way. Polygamy also bothers me now due to the child brides and polyandry. Lucy Walker's story in particular is suspect and looks highly coercive. BY's succession looks rather suspicious.
Social issues weren't really a big deal until recently. Then I found out that gay->straight conversion therapy has no known success stories and is deeply emotionally damaging, that mixed orientation marriages are disastrous, and realized that celibacy will never be satisfying in a family-obsessed church. When my gay married coworker came out to me (he's not totally public about it due to his unsupportive parents) a little while ago, it made me realize that I can no longer stand by the church on this issue.
Even as a guy, modesty has left quite a bit of collateral damage on me. I was once a staunch defender of modesty. Then I saw the bloggernacle and realized that maybe it wasn't so good. I have since realized that the teachings have made me judgmental and obsessive about the clothing choices of women (I need to deprogram that at the very least) and they have no theological or scriptural basis whatsoever. The church's views on sexuality and general prudishness of the culture (especially in the US) are unhelpful and sometimes even damaging. Scott Cannon's story really resonated with me because I have "struggled" with masturbation for about 4 years. As a YM, my bishop told me not to take the sacrament because I masturbated. I came to find out on my mission that that wasn't what all bishops do that- in fact I would venture to say that most don't. At any rate, I concluded at the beginning of the year that masturbation is not a sin and that it is perfectly healthy in moderation. (i.e. once/day or less) I have felt much happier as a result. You can reasonably throw porn under the same umbrella. While much of it is created in unethical ways and it can be bad for relationships, it's not the slippery slope or destructive poison the church says it is. I don't think I believe that premarital sex is wrong. It can be stupid in many cases, sure (especially teen sex), but it's not this horrific evil.
Since my shelf broke, everything I once believed has been falling apart. I am okay with this. I am at peace with probably leaving the church. I'm making a slow, cautious exit and giving God ample opportunity to stop me if that's his plan. Then again, at this point even if the Mormon God is the true god, I don't think I really want to associate with the kind of god that tears people from their families if they don't jump through the right hoops. Or one that doesn't love us all unconditionally. Or one that demands loyalty before integrity (*cough* Abraham and Isaac *cough*). Call me a blasphemer, but I'm better than that kind of god. The god I came to know on my mission was never that petty. Is that god the true god? I don't know, but I hope he is. I hope there is an afterlife led by an omniloving duo of parental equals. Does that mean I believe it? No, but I want to believe in a unconditionally loving heavenly mother and father. I guess that makes me agnostic.
I was born and raised in the church. I'm in my mid 20s and single, so there is really nothing tying me down, so the only reason I would really want to stay in the church is if I could find some level of belief that I find comfortable. I suspect that isn't going to happen and even though I promised my best friend and parents I'd read the BoM and a book by the Givens' before I finalize my leaving, it feels like a fool's errand at this point. I no longer trust the church leadership and even though there are some good things here and there, I feel like it's a net negative. I have no plans to have my name removed, but that may change if the church continues to defend sexual predators and excommunicate scholars and "apostates."
While my FC wasn't in full swing until about 7 months ago, my doubts can be traced back at least 6 years ago in debates with an atheist online. I backed up to the apologetics and put things on my shelf. I shrugged it off and then went on a stateside mission. It was an overall good experience which helped me to become the man I am today, but I dealt with a lot of depression and anxiety trying to live up to the impossible mission standards. It took me about a year to finally get over my disobedient points and forgive myself. Depression runs in my family, so it would be unfair to blame that on the church, but it certainly didn't do much to help and may have actually contributed to it. But I took it all very seriously.
I never cared for going to the temple. My first time through completely freaked me out. If they were still doing the blood oaths, I would have left the church right there and then. I sorta got over that, but there are still things that bother me, like the veils and general sexism. (For instance, the temple video fails the Bechdel test)
I'm pretty intelligent. I knew my stuff. I knew a lot of docrinal things and quite a lot of the nicer parts of church history. I noticed that people didn't really know or care about any of those things. Church members don't understand grace, for instance. I don't forget facts easily, so it never made sense to me why you supposedly needed to keep reading the scriptures and stuff to maintain a testimony. It always looked a bit suspicious- like brainwashing.
Historical things in the church were never really a big deal to me. BY was a racist? Eh. Easy to shrug off. The brethren thought it was revelation and were very conservative with repealing the priesthood ban. JS used a stone in a hat to translate? Sure, whatever. Even coming to the conclusion that the BoM probably wasn't historical (I'm now 99.9% sure of that) wasn't a big deal to me because it didn't need to be historical to be the word of God (now I don't believe that either because it's actually quite coercive and spiritually manipulative). OTOH, the history of tithing and BY's self-exemption from it rubbed me the wrong way. Polygamy also bothers me now due to the child brides and polyandry. Lucy Walker's story in particular is suspect and looks highly coercive. BY's succession looks rather suspicious.
Social issues weren't really a big deal until recently. Then I found out that gay->straight conversion therapy has no known success stories and is deeply emotionally damaging, that mixed orientation marriages are disastrous, and realized that celibacy will never be satisfying in a family-obsessed church. When my gay married coworker came out to me (he's not totally public about it due to his unsupportive parents) a little while ago, it made me realize that I can no longer stand by the church on this issue.
Even as a guy, modesty has left quite a bit of collateral damage on me. I was once a staunch defender of modesty. Then I saw the bloggernacle and realized that maybe it wasn't so good. I have since realized that the teachings have made me judgmental and obsessive about the clothing choices of women (I need to deprogram that at the very least) and they have no theological or scriptural basis whatsoever. The church's views on sexuality and general prudishness of the culture (especially in the US) are unhelpful and sometimes even damaging. Scott Cannon's story really resonated with me because I have "struggled" with masturbation for about 4 years. As a YM, my bishop told me not to take the sacrament because I masturbated. I came to find out on my mission that that wasn't what all bishops do that- in fact I would venture to say that most don't. At any rate, I concluded at the beginning of the year that masturbation is not a sin and that it is perfectly healthy in moderation. (i.e. once/day or less) I have felt much happier as a result. You can reasonably throw porn under the same umbrella. While much of it is created in unethical ways and it can be bad for relationships, it's not the slippery slope or destructive poison the church says it is. I don't think I believe that premarital sex is wrong. It can be stupid in many cases, sure (especially teen sex), but it's not this horrific evil.
Since my shelf broke, everything I once believed has been falling apart. I am okay with this. I am at peace with probably leaving the church. I'm making a slow, cautious exit and giving God ample opportunity to stop me if that's his plan. Then again, at this point even if the Mormon God is the true god, I don't think I really want to associate with the kind of god that tears people from their families if they don't jump through the right hoops. Or one that doesn't love us all unconditionally. Or one that demands loyalty before integrity (*cough* Abraham and Isaac *cough*). Call me a blasphemer, but I'm better than that kind of god. The god I came to know on my mission was never that petty. Is that god the true god? I don't know, but I hope he is. I hope there is an afterlife led by an omniloving duo of parental equals. Does that mean I believe it? No, but I want to believe in a unconditionally loving heavenly mother and father. I guess that makes me agnostic.