Casimir Liszinski
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 11:54 am
I looked this person up yesterday during down-time. Casimir Liszinski was a seventeenth-century Polish nobleman who was executed in a horrid manner for atheism in 1689. He became an atheist after reading a book of arguments for the existence of God that was full of contradictions, mockingly writing "ergo non est Deus" in the margin. This is the account of the Catholic bishop who presided over his execution:
One must wonder: if God be omnipotent and so easily offended, why was he unable to strike Liszinski dead himself? It is also telling that the most unforgivable offence is denying his existence, despite the fact that he doesn't make himself evident.
One of the surviving fragments of De non existentia Dei says the following, which is particularly salient to the Mormon church:
In fact, it was so cruel that even the Pope objected.Bishop Załuski wrote: After recantation the culprit [Liszinski] was conducted to the scaffold, where the executioner tore with a burning iron the tongue and the mouth, with which he had been cruel against God; after which his hands, the instruments of the abominable production, were burnt at a slow fire, the sacrilegious paper [an essay Liszinski wrote entitled De non existentia Dei] was thrown into the flames; finally himself, that monster of his century, this deicide was thrown into the expiatory flames; expiatory if such a crime may be atoned for.
One must wonder: if God be omnipotent and so easily offended, why was he unable to strike Liszinski dead himself? It is also telling that the most unforgivable offence is denying his existence, despite the fact that he doesn't make himself evident.
One of the surviving fragments of De non existentia Dei says the following, which is particularly salient to the Mormon church:
TBMs willingly pay ten percent of their income off the top for their entire lives; give up two of their best years to become paying salesmen for the church; and they react in a very hostile manner if you attempt to tell them that this is horrible and controlling! Such is the nature of cults.[S]imple folk are cheated by the more cunning with the fabrication of God for their own oppression; whereas the same oppression is shielded by the folk in a way, that if the wise attempted to free them by the truth, they would be quelled by the very people.