PART 3 (final): The First Presidency's response to my letter
Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 9:39 am
This is Part 3-final
(please see Part 1--posted May 5; and Part 2—posted May 6 for more context)
--
Recap:
-I sent a letter to the Q15 requesting a written statement of remorse, of regret, for withholding the complete truth regarding Joseph’s plural marriages throughout church history
-The letter was pushed back to the Stake level.
-The Stake President stated that he was the response from the First Presidency.
-I responded that to move forward, I need to hear from the Q15 and asked him for recommendations to achieve this.
Here is the response I received from the Stake President
(out of respect, I paraphrase, since this was his personal communication to me):
-I reaffirm my commitment to meet with you as necessary to overcome doubts in your faith
-But there is nothing more we can do to solicit a response from Salt Lake
My response to him:
“I will continue to strive for my goal of receiving a direct response from Salt Lake, because it is only they that can demonstrate accountability for the actions of church leadership as a whole.
Do you have a contact you could share with me to get me started?”
His response.
-I don’t
My response:
“I'll start my due diligence....”
-When I read these words, that there was nothing more we could do, a flood of different thoughts came to my mind:
-Oh yeah, watch me
-and I thought isn’t the worth of souls great in the sight of God?
-The Shepherd does not send the ninety-and-nine to bring back “the one”; He does it Himself
-After decades of service and sacrifice, my response from the church begins with (I assume) a form letter?
-I can’t be the only one that is experiencing this
And it’s not right that the Church’s response to the public outcry caused by the plural marriage essay blames members like me for not knowing about it.
Their response included “Much of what you’ll find in the essay…-is- known among long-term members.”
These words refer to members like me and are personally offensive.
-Blaming me because I didn’t know these things and implying that it’s my own fault
-That reading from the “best books” throughout my life was not enough
-That being trained as a missionary and serving a full-time mission wasn’t enough
-That being ordained a High Priest was not enough
-That being sealed for eternity was not enough
And that I am having a less than stellar reaction due to my own lack of action.
The church must be the source of it’s own truth.
If it has not taught it, but has in fact concealed it, why is it my fault?
Church leadership has only themselves to blame, because the Culture of Concealment has been perpetuated by them for decades.
So there is nothing we can do?
--more to come
(please see Part 1--posted May 5; and Part 2—posted May 6 for more context)
--
Recap:
-I sent a letter to the Q15 requesting a written statement of remorse, of regret, for withholding the complete truth regarding Joseph’s plural marriages throughout church history
-The letter was pushed back to the Stake level.
-The Stake President stated that he was the response from the First Presidency.
-I responded that to move forward, I need to hear from the Q15 and asked him for recommendations to achieve this.
Here is the response I received from the Stake President
(out of respect, I paraphrase, since this was his personal communication to me):
-I reaffirm my commitment to meet with you as necessary to overcome doubts in your faith
-But there is nothing more we can do to solicit a response from Salt Lake
My response to him:
“I will continue to strive for my goal of receiving a direct response from Salt Lake, because it is only they that can demonstrate accountability for the actions of church leadership as a whole.
Do you have a contact you could share with me to get me started?”
His response.
-I don’t
My response:
“I'll start my due diligence....”
-When I read these words, that there was nothing more we could do, a flood of different thoughts came to my mind:
-Oh yeah, watch me
-and I thought isn’t the worth of souls great in the sight of God?
-The Shepherd does not send the ninety-and-nine to bring back “the one”; He does it Himself
-After decades of service and sacrifice, my response from the church begins with (I assume) a form letter?
-I can’t be the only one that is experiencing this
And it’s not right that the Church’s response to the public outcry caused by the plural marriage essay blames members like me for not knowing about it.
Their response included “Much of what you’ll find in the essay…-is- known among long-term members.”
These words refer to members like me and are personally offensive.
-Blaming me because I didn’t know these things and implying that it’s my own fault
-That reading from the “best books” throughout my life was not enough
-That being trained as a missionary and serving a full-time mission wasn’t enough
-That being ordained a High Priest was not enough
-That being sealed for eternity was not enough
And that I am having a less than stellar reaction due to my own lack of action.
The church must be the source of it’s own truth.
If it has not taught it, but has in fact concealed it, why is it my fault?
Church leadership has only themselves to blame, because the Culture of Concealment has been perpetuated by them for decades.
So there is nothing we can do?
--more to come