Page 5 of 5

Re: 70 ex'ed

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:01 am
by Red Ryder
Not sure Ra has conclusive proof of a forged signature.

While they do look different, we know they use an auto pen/signature stamp for most official communication letters. Signatures change as old men get older.

Interesting to see if this goes anywhere.

I'm going to continue to believe Hamula was playing hide and seek with Capt'n Winky!

Re: 70 ex'ed

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:05 am
by FiveFingerMnemonic
Red Ryder wrote: Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:01 am Not sure Ra has conclusive proof of a forged signature.

While they do look different, we know they use an auto pen/signature stamp for most official communication letters. Signatures change as old men get older.

Interesting to see if this goes anywhere.

I'm going to continue to believe Hamula was playing hide and seek with Capt'n Winky!
Yes my feeling is Ra is mad at Hamula over his statements of using tithing for a large land development which seems to be standard operating procedure anyway. It has that feeling of using Hamula's misfortune of being ex'ed as an opportunistic sounding board. It would take a handwriting/forgery expert's opinion to make this allegation more convincing.

Re: 70 ex'ed

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 11:50 am
by Anon70
Reddit had a thread yesterday from someone who knew but couldn't tell why he knew....that it was an affair and the woman was the one that confessed. Take that for what it's worth....which is not much.

Re: 70 ex'ed

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 2:49 pm
by 2bizE
I think it is important to know and review the facts before making a judgement. (We probably wouldn't be on this site if we had all of the Mormon history facts many years ago).
Here is a link to a slide presentation RA provides to bolster her claims.

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/ ... slide=id.p

Another one:
https://saveccnz.wordpress.com/2017/08/ ... g-local-2/

Re: 70 ex'ed

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:37 pm
by Hermey
Anon70 wrote: Wed Sep 13, 2017 11:50 am Reddit had a thread yesterday from someone who knew but couldn't tell why he knew....that it was an affair and the woman was the one that confessed. Take that for what it's worth....which is not much.
The St. Judas the Traitor 1st Ward can be quite interesting some weeks. This past Sunday was one of them. All I can say is that I heard that he "lost his testimony." There are a number of things that could actually mean. Unfortunately, I am not at liberty to say how I heard that or give any additional detail. The Church went pretty overboard trying to assure the faithful that Apostasy was not the issue. That makes the source and the comment all the more interesting. :o Maybe someday I'll be able to share more.

Re: 70 ex'ed

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2017 10:57 pm
by Anon70
Hermey wrote: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:37 pm
Anon70 wrote: Wed Sep 13, 2017 11:50 am Reddit had a thread yesterday from someone who knew but couldn't tell why he knew....that it was an affair and the woman was the one that confessed. Take that for what it's worth....which is not much.
The St. Judas the Traitor 1st Ward can be quite interesting some weeks. This past Sunday was one of them. All I can say is that I heard that he "lost his testimony." There are a number of things that could actually mean. Unfortunately, I am not at liberty to say how I heard that or give any additional detail. The Church went pretty overboard trying to assure the faithful that Apostasy was not the issue. That makes the source and the comment all the more interesting. :o Maybe someday I'll be able to share more.
I always thought the whole "don't speculate" thing just made everyone speculate even more. If I were Hamula, I would hate the attention and people knowing my personal business. And yet...I speculate 😁