Page 3 of 3

Re: Oaks face 2 face thread

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2020 2:56 pm
by Reuben
nibbler wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2020 1:14 pm I looked it up:

Physical
Intellectual
Spiritual
Social
Wait, what?

Are you taking the piss, or is this real? Is it actually called PISS?

Re: Oaks face 2 face thread

Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2020 4:26 pm
by nibbler
They probably order them differently to avoid the acronym, but yeah, those are the four things.

Which is weird. In recent years I could have sworn that the church was against at least two of those.

Re: Oaks face 2 face thread

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2020 9:43 pm
by Random
MoPag wrote: Sun Feb 23, 2020 4:08 pm They are sitting super close to him. I would not get that close to that man. Back up kids!!!
It's possible they were told to get that close, so it would look good. Or maybe he thought it would look better.

Re: Oaks face 2 face thread

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2020 9:48 pm
by Random
Red Ryder wrote: Sun Feb 23, 2020 9:25 pm 2. Pair the wive’s with the Apostles in a public forum to squelch the complaints that it’s a men’s club.
It seems like the wives are more visible/vocal since Nelson became president.

Re: Oaks face 2 face thread

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2020 9:51 pm
by Random
Thanks for the play by play. I like the fact that they were short but descriptive.


Also, I had no idea this was even happening. (If I did at one point, it slipped out of my head permanently.)

Re: Oaks face 2 face thread

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2020 10:41 am
by wtfluff
Random wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2020 9:48 pm
Red Ryder wrote: Sun Feb 23, 2020 9:25 pm 2. Pair the wive’s with the Apostles in a public forum to squelch the complaints that it’s a men’s club.
It seems like the wives are more visible/vocal since Nelson became president.
Which wives? The 1st wives, or the 2nd wives?




(Just kidding! Only kidding.)




(Kind of...)

Re: Oaks face 2 face thread

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 5:39 am
by Reuben
Random wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2020 9:48 pm
Red Ryder wrote: Sun Feb 23, 2020 9:25 pm 2. Pair the wive’s with the Apostles in a public forum to squelch the complaints that it’s a men’s club.
It seems like the wives are more visible/vocal since Nelson became president.
Think he's having revelations via Sister Nelson?

FWIW, my wife likes this change, without of course disliking the old way.

Re: Oaks face 2 face thread

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 10:00 am
by Red Ryder
nibbler wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2020 4:26 pm They probably order them differently to avoid the acronym, but yeah, those are the four things.

Which is weird. In recent years I could have sworn that the church was against at least two of those.
Physical justifies the church basketball culture prominent amongst the young men. Not to appear sexist, physical supports the boob job capital of the world for the “I’m FINALLY done having kids at age 45” lady members of the church.

Intellectual, we all know where that leads if your considering critical thinking. However, the church is full of intellectuals that have never had a critical thought towards the church or their testimony.

Re: Oaks face 2 face thread

Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2020 2:26 pm
by Random
wtfluff wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2020 10:41 am Which wives? The 1st wives, or the 2nd wives?
Current wives.


Reuben wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 5:39 am Think he's having revelations via Sister Nelson?
I'm on the fence about this . . . but, possibly so.