NOM

Posted: **Thu Aug 29, 2019 4:31 pm**

fetchface wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 7:19 am If I didn't know better, I'd think that this organization was led with a bunch of guys, all with different opinions on how things should be run, instead of being run by God himself.

Thank the Lard you know better and you are not thinking those awful doubting thoughts.

Posted: **Thu Aug 29, 2019 9:04 pm**

asb wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2019 3:07 pm It looks like the "acceptable" language has been there for some time. Here is the Internet Archive version of Handbook 2 from December 26, 2018.

https://web.archive.org/web/20181226192 ... s?lang=eng

This doesn't render correctly in the browser, at least in Chrome, but if you view the page source, search for "21.1.34" and read the HTML, you can see the "'Mormons' is acceptable" verbiage.

I found it back in 2017 on the wayback machine also.

So this is old wording that hasn't been updated... And Stan just Keeps. On. Winning!

NOM

Calling Ourselves Mormons Is "Acceptable" Again

Re: Calling Ourselves Mormons Is "Acceptable" Again

Re: Calling Ourselves Mormons Is "Acceptable" Again