Page 2 of 2

Re: Impractical, uncomfortable, and unsightly

Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2018 9:59 pm
by FiveFingerMnemonic
Sheamus Moore wrote:
809250CB-8FDB-405B-AC2D-47E02E879671.jpeg
Garments: The other fire insurance (as long as you don’t violate any of the rules and regulations for wearing them, of course).
Love this obscure artwork reference.

Re: Impractical, uncomfortable, and unsightly

Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2018 9:36 pm
by Bremguy
I quit wearing my garments a long time ago. I have MS (multiple sclerosis) and heat bothers me. Here in Washington St. we are having, for us , a heat wave of sorts. Many days a bit over 90, a couple of weeks over 80. I cannot wear them, no matter what. I do wear the tops when I make it to church, sort of a Sunday thing. About the only time I do wear them is when it is extremely cold. Otherwise, they just occupy space in a drawer.

In all reality, the idea of garments are idiotic. I just wont give the Church that much power over me.

Re: Impractical, uncomfortable, and unsightly

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:01 am
by Archimedes
The church missed a huge opportunity in the 50's when they decided not to use the new asbestos/cotton blend for the jesus jammies. Heat resistant AND fire retardant. Or maybe just retarded...

Re: Impractical, uncomfortable, and unsightly

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:19 am
by Archimedes
Image

Re: Impractical, uncomfortable, and unsightly

Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:26 am
by Hermey
slavereeno wrote: Tue Jul 24, 2018 3:48 pm Also, I wondered if this guy understood what parts of the body these things are touching, how reverent am I supposed to be with the stuff directly touching my stinky bits 24/7?

Every ass-crack is sacred.