NOM

Sunday afternoon is the 2nd string 70's practice session. That's why it is extra special.

+ 2 for a nice accent

The "perverse men drawing away disciples" are right behind you buddy

MoPag wrote: ↑Sun Oct 01, 2017 2:11 pm + 2 for a nice accent

-5 for shunning doctrine

He seems to be saying we need to work so hard we don't have time to think.

nibbler wrote: ↑Sun Oct 01, 2017 2:15 pm

MoPag wrote: ↑Sun Oct 01, 2017 2:11 pm + 2 for a nice accent

+2 for an accent that says Gad instead of God

Ugh! Not a worship the prophet talk. - 10

At least Anderson is open about wanting people to obey the Q15 rather than using the euphemism of trusting God.

-5 per conference talk per conference talk FROM THIS SESSION that he quotes. So... -25? Did I count right?

EDIT : Another couple quotes gives -35.

Also, cog.dis. is totally normal. Stop worrying.

ulmite wrote: ↑Sun Oct 01, 2017 2:42 pm -5 per conference talk per conference talk FROM THIS SESSION that he quotes. So... -25? Did I count right?

Yes!

Nelson will have a hard time sitting down with that last speaker stuck to his butt.

Didn't Moses suggest not having other gods before God?
Then why worship GA's?

One was discussing how he came up with stuff for conference talks...
Wouldn't servants of God have more to report on than trivial things like that?

I love the music - even if I disagree with lyrical interpretation.

Newme wrote: ↑Sun Oct 01, 2017 2:52 pm

I love the music - even if I disagree with lyrical interpretation.

Me too.

I only caught snippets of the first 3 talks. I might go back and listen to them. I might not.

I will probably do a final points thread tomorrow. So keep awarding or removing points as you feel moved upon by the Spirit of NOM.

I don't remember the name of the last speaker (it's one of the Q-12), but I'd give him a -25 for blatant suck-up content.

Silver Girl wrote: ↑Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:53 pm I don't remember the name of the last speaker (it's one of the Q-12), but I'd give him a -25 for blatant suck-up content.

Neal Andersen.

LSOF wrote: ↑Sun Oct 01, 2017 6:47 pm

Silver Girl wrote: ↑Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:53 pm I don't remember the name of the last speaker (it's one of the Q-12), but I'd give him a -25 for blatant suck-up content.

Neal Andersen.

Or Neil "Kit Kat" Andersen, as I like to call him.

blazerb wrote: ↑Sun Oct 01, 2017 2:15 pm He seems to be saying we need to work so hard we don't have time to think.

That was how I felt in my last bishopric stint. That approach became a heavy shelf item.