Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Discussions toward a better understanding of LDS doctrine, history, and culture. Discussion of Christianity, religion, and faith in general is welcome.
Post Reply
User avatar
Hagoth
Posts: 7304
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:13 pm

Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by Hagoth »

Hard liquor is out. Same for wine, unless it's of your own making. Beer seems to be ok, considering that it is a mild barley drink. But what about hard cider? It is not a distilled "strong drink;" it's fermented, like beer. More importantly it was THE most common beverage in North America in the early 19th century and that drunk by men, women, and children instead of water which was as often deadly as not.

Why isn't it mentioned specifically in the revelation?
“The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also.” -Mark Twain

Jesus: "The Kingdom of God is within you." The Buddha: "Be your own light."
User avatar
jfro18
Posts: 2079
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:41 pm

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by jfro18 »

Could JS have felt it was addressed with hot drinks?
User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5289
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by moksha »

It was probably too popular and widely drunk by the pre-Utah Mormons to be included.

When Emma and the girls (sister-wives) complained about the disgusting mess left after late-night School of the Prophets meetings, strewn whiskey bottles, and tobacco spit that missed the spittoon were the irksome items (although the full spittoons would have also been disgusting).

Coffee and tea drinking was neat and tidy, but neither of them provided the buzz you needed for late-night prophecy.
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha
User avatar
2bizE
Posts: 2463
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:33 pm

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by 2bizE »

Did they even call it hard cider back then? It probably was just cider, and everyone including the kids drank it…
~2bizE
User avatar
nibbler
Posts: 973
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:12 pm

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by nibbler »

Hagoth wrote: Wed Aug 18, 2021 1:24 pm Why isn't it mentioned specifically in the revelation?
God hadn't heard about it.
We don’t see things as they are, we see them as we are.
– Anais Nin
User avatar
Red Ryder
Posts: 4182
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:14 pm

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by Red Ryder »

I think this goes back to the deeper doctrines of the temple ceremony. If I recall correctly:

Micheal = Adam
Adam + Eve = humanity
Humans + Sin = Gods plan

Micheal the archangel is the “Mike” behind Mike’s Hard Lemonade.
“It always devolves to Pantaloons. Always.” ~ Fluffy

“I switched baristas” ~ Lady Gaga

“Those who do not move do not notice their chains.” ~Rosa Luxemburg
User avatar
blazerb
Posts: 1615
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2017 4:35 pm

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by blazerb »

I think it's because it could not be part of the tit for tat. Emma wanted the boys to give up whiskey and chewing tobacco. Fine, said JS, but the women have to give up coffee and tea. They all liked the cider so there was no value in forbidding it.
User avatar
jfro18
Posts: 2079
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:41 pm

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by jfro18 »

blazerb wrote: Thu Aug 19, 2021 4:49 pm I think it's because it could not be part of the tit for tat. Emma wanted the boys to give up whiskey and chewing tobacco. Fine, said JS, but the women have to give up coffee and tea. They all liked the cider so there was no value in forbidding it.
Is there any kind of documentation/evidence that JS used coffee/tea to stick it back at Emma and the wives?

I have heard this a few times but never knew it was speculation that he did it this way or if there was any kind of corroboration for it. I just always assumed it was because those were the teachings floating around him at the time as to hot drinks being unhealthy as people believed they could injure you internally.
User avatar
blazerb
Posts: 1615
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2017 4:35 pm

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by blazerb »

jfro18 wrote: Thu Aug 19, 2021 6:17 pm Is there any kind of documentation/evidence that JS used coffee/tea to stick it back at Emma and the wives?

I have heard this a few times but never knew it was speculation that he did it this way or if there was any kind of corroboration for it. I just always assumed it was because those were the teachings floating around him at the time as to hot drinks being unhealthy as people believed they could injure you internally.
My comment was more tongue in cheek than anything. I spent a little time looking up the history. As I read, there may not be much evidence that the coffee and tea thing was used to "stick it" to the women. Prohibiting distilled alcohol, tobacco, coffee, and tea were common tenets of temperance societies of the day. Many even discouraged meat eating, if I'm reading correctly. See here: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/5039/

Based on a very quick reading, a more realistic answer to the question may be that the temperance societies were split on whether fermented, as opposed to distilled, drinks were harmful. Some temperance societies condemned wine and beer, others did not. I think JS either split down the middle saying wine was out but the others were fine, or he grabbed his revelation from some particular group with idiosyncratic ideas about which drinks were acceptable. I'll keep looking to see if there is evidence that he was looking for things that women would have to give up.
User avatar
wtfluff
Posts: 3687
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:20 pm
Location: Worshiping Gravity / Pulling Taffy

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by wtfluff »

jfro18 wrote: Thu Aug 19, 2021 6:17 pm Is there any kind of documentation/evidence that JS used coffee/tea to stick it back at Emma and the wives?
There's an old Sunstone article about the WoW that may have mentioned this? Yes, I'm too lazy to go looking.

If I didn't read it there, I probably heard it on a podcast how Joe "used" the WoW to get back at Emma.
Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. -Frater Ravus

IDKSAF -RubinHighlander

Gave up who I am for who you wanted me to be...
User avatar
jfro18
Posts: 2079
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:41 pm

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by jfro18 »

blazerb wrote: Fri Aug 20, 2021 11:37 am Based on a very quick reading, a more realistic answer to the question may be that the temperance societies were split on whether fermented, as opposed to distilled, drinks were harmful. Some temperance societies condemned wine and beer, others did not. I think JS either split down the middle saying wine was out but the others were fine, or he grabbed his revelation from some particular group with idiosyncratic ideas about which drinks were acceptable. I'll keep looking to see if there is evidence that he was looking for things that women would have to give up.
Don't spend any time on it - I've heard it in multiple places before and just wondered if there was something out there that indicated Joseph Smith put tea/coffee in there to be vindictive.

Considering I think they all continued to drink tea/coffee for the most part I don't think it was enforced in any way, but it would be something else if JS had done that to punish Emma for pushing for that revelation.
User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5289
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by moksha »

jfro18 wrote: Fri Aug 20, 2021 6:59 pm Joseph Smith put tea/coffee in there to be vindictive.
If those women folk can take away our whiskey and tobacco, then by Jiminy we can take away their tea and coffee!!! Those Sister-Wives will rue the day when we serve red Kool-Aid at their weddings.
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha
User avatar
2bizE
Posts: 2463
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:33 pm

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by 2bizE »

Is cider only from apples? Or did they make it from other fruit too?
~2bizE
User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5289
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by moksha »

2bizE, there is a similar drink made from pears called Perry.

Mormon apologists would probably argue that the cider during Joseph Smith's day was actually 7 Up, similar to the incident at a wedding in Cana, where Jesus turned water into grape juice.
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha
User avatar
Just This Guy
Posts: 1549
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2016 3:30 pm
Location: Almost Heaven

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by Just This Guy »

blazerb wrote: Fri Aug 20, 2021 11:37 am Based on a very quick reading, a more realistic answer to the question may be that the temperance societies were split on whether fermented, as opposed to distilled, drinks were harmful. Some temperance societies condemned wine and beer, others did not. I think JS either split down the middle saying wine was out but the others were fine, or he grabbed his revelation from some particular group with idiosyncratic ideas about which drinks were acceptable. I'll keep looking to see if there is evidence that he was looking for things that women would have to give up.
D&C 89:6 Says "And, behold, this should be wine, yea, apure wine of the grape of the vine, of your own make." Does anyone have any reference to what "pure wine" is in a 1830's context?

On one hand JS says that wine is bad but in the next verse he says it's okay if you make it yourself. We know JS had the revelation about sacrament wine could be water or wine of your own make because wine made by outsiders was bad.

So was JS against wine or was a a way to maintain paranoia against outsiders and keep up the everyone-is-out-to-get-us rhetoric?
"The story so far: In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move." -- Douglas Adams
User avatar
blazerb
Posts: 1615
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2017 4:35 pm

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by blazerb »

Just This Guy wrote: Wed Aug 25, 2021 5:15 am D&C 89:6 Says "And, behold, this should be wine, yea, apure wine of the grape of the vine, of your own make." Does anyone have any reference to what "pure wine" is in a 1830's context?

On one hand JS says that wine is bad but in the next verse he says it's okay if you make it yourself. We know JS had the revelation about sacrament wine could be water or wine of your own make because wine made by outsiders was bad.

So was JS against wine or was a a way to maintain paranoia against outsiders and keep up the everyone-is-out-to-get-us rhetoric?
Maybe he wanted to make sure he could give the wine his own special ingredients to make sure everyone had a spiritual experience?

That is also pure speculation. I don't find much firm evidence that JS used entheogenics.
User avatar
AdmiralHoldo
Posts: 380
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2018 5:49 am
Location: Lazy Learner Land

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by AdmiralHoldo »

I'm listening to Daniel Okrent's book on Prohibition right now, and it's interesting that hard cider was specifically excluded from the Volstead act. (Wine was drunk by rich people, and beer was drunk by German immigrants, who were... not popular... in the early 20th century.) Reason being, the farmers would have never gone along with it otherwise, since turning apples into a tasty alcoholic drink was how they "preserved" their crops 😂

Considering that the WoW wasn't actually enforced until American Prohibition kicked in, maybe there's a parallel there.
Last edited by AdmiralHoldo on Thu Sep 02, 2021 6:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Hagoth
Posts: 7304
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:13 pm

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by Hagoth »

Just This Guy wrote: Wed Aug 25, 2021 5:15 am Does anyone have any reference to what "pure wine" is in a 1830's context?
I can take a guess at it. The wine Joseph passed around in a bucket at the Kirtland temple dedication was referred to by attendees as "mixed wine." The question is what was mixed into it? Was it fortified with distilled liquor? Was it enriched with psychedelic substances? All we know is that those who drank it had a very different experience than those who did not, and saw things that the others did not.

With that as a reference, I would say that "pure wine" means grapes only. No shenanegans.

Incidentally, when we read about wine in ancient contexts they are very rarely describing "pure wine," especially if it is being used for a religious or ceremonial purpose.
“The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also.” -Mark Twain

Jesus: "The Kingdom of God is within you." The Buddha: "Be your own light."
User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5289
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by moksha »

Hagoth wrote: Mon Aug 30, 2021 5:20 pm The wine Joseph passed around in a bucket at the Kirtland temple dedication was referred to by attendees as "mixed wine." The question is what was mixed into it? Was it fortified with distilled liquor? Was it enriched with psychedelic substances? All we know is that those who drank it had a very different experience than those who did not, and saw things that the others did not.
This article on the practice of adding hallucinogens to wine is interesting. Is it conceivable for people in Kirkland to have somehow received the ancient knowledge of psychedelics?

https://www.vice.com/en/article/jgqej4/ ... ucinogenic
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha
User avatar
Hagoth
Posts: 7304
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:13 pm

Re: Why doesn't the WoW address cider specifically?

Post by Hagoth »

moksha wrote: Tue Aug 31, 2021 8:14 pm
Hagoth wrote: Mon Aug 30, 2021 5:20 pm The wine Joseph passed around in a bucket at the Kirtland temple dedication was referred to by attendees as "mixed wine." The question is what was mixed into it? Was it fortified with distilled liquor? Was it enriched with psychedelic substances? All we know is that those who drank it had a very different experience than those who did not, and saw things that the others did not.
This article on the practice of adding hallucinogens to wine is interesting. Is it conceivable for people in Kirkland to have somehow received the ancient knowledge of psychedelics?

https://www.vice.com/en/article/jgqej4/ ... ucinogenic
It could very possible it was one of the occult/spiritual practices Joseph learned from Lumen Walter.

I recently read the book discussed in that article, Moksha, and it's fascinating. The big disappointment is that the Catholic church has sacramental chalices that were excavated from the earliest underground Christian churches that have residue of the sacramental wines, but they will not allow them to be analyzed. But it has now been proven that at least some of the Greek Mystery cults were using ergotized beer (LSD).

The evidence that Christianity grew out of the Dionysus mystery cult is pretty eye-opening, maybe even startling.
“The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also.” -Mark Twain

Jesus: "The Kingdom of God is within you." The Buddha: "Be your own light."
Post Reply