There are websites to help you with that...
FAIRMormon changes their name
Re: FAIRMormon changes their name
“Some say he’s wanted by the CIA and that he sleeps upside down like a Bat. All we know is he’s called the Stig.”
“Some say that he lives in a tree, and that his sweat can be used to clean precious metals. All we know is he’s called the Stig.”
“Some say that he lives in a tree, and that his sweat can be used to clean precious metals. All we know is he’s called the Stig.”
Re: FAIRMormon changes their name
I know...but there could be some double meaning in there!
“Some say he’s wanted by the CIA and that he sleeps upside down like a Bat. All we know is he’s called the Stig.”
“Some say that he lives in a tree, and that his sweat can be used to clean precious metals. All we know is he’s called the Stig.”
“Some say that he lives in a tree, and that his sweat can be used to clean precious metals. All we know is he’s called the Stig.”
Re: FAIRMormon changes their name
I know there was an intentional double meaning with plausible deniability....but everything In Mormonism has a double meaning.
~2bizE
Re: FAIRMormon changes their name
Or more than one...depending on which way the apologetic wind is blowing.
“Some say he’s wanted by the CIA and that he sleeps upside down like a Bat. All we know is he’s called the Stig.”
“Some say that he lives in a tree, and that his sweat can be used to clean precious metals. All we know is he’s called the Stig.”
“Some say that he lives in a tree, and that his sweat can be used to clean precious metals. All we know is he’s called the Stig.”
Re: FAIRMormon changes their name
Either way, they're still playing the part of counsel for a guilty defendant.
Learn to doubt the stories you tell about yourselves and your adversaries.
-
Just This Guy
- Posts: 1549
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2016 3:30 pm
- Location: Almost Heaven
Re: FAIRMormon changes their name
My guess: The viewership and reaction to the TITS videos were too poor. Between very low view counts to start with and overwhelmingly negative feedback, the videos were likely not making money. Youtube bases monetization on view count, superscribe count, and the amount of likes per video. by turning off likes/dislikes, they loose out on part of the algorithm to start with. The viewer ship and subscriptions were not enough to make up for the lack of likes. So these videos were not able to monetize based on Youtube's algorithms. So the cost to make these videos was not getting offset from YouTube revenue.
"The story so far: In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move." -- Douglas Adams