SaidNobody wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:39 pm
Even if there wasn't obvious fraud, there are many situations where Republicans were ejected from the counting process. Also, in PA, the government had Act 77 2019 passed that allowed for mass mail-in ballots, but PA Constitution Article VII Section 14 restricts mail ballots to specific reasons. So the mail-in ballots violated the PA constitution. Sure, a lot of people thought it was convenient to have this law because of the pandemic, but how would the governor know about the pandemic in October of 2019? He legally blocked republican poll watchers which should a given from a fair election. Plus, he extended the voting period 3 days, which even the state shouldn't have the power to do. This is a national election, one state cannot randomly change the rules.
The constitutionality of PA mail in ballots is one of the few cases that has merits in my opinion. But we should clarify who put Act 77 in place. The Democratic Governor, Tom Wolfe, signed it, but the Republican controlled PA Senate and Republican controlled PA House passed it. I think it's debatable whether mail in ballots as enacted in Act 77 are a violation of the PA constitution, but let's say for the sake of argument that Act 77 is unconstitutional. The proper legal recourse will not and should not be the nullification of 2.5M Pennsylvanians votes. The bi-partisan PA government rolled-out mail in voting, posted instructions on their websites and in print. Voters in good faith followed those instructions and cast their votes. Now, only after the vote tally is done and the GOPs preferred candidate came up short, the GOP is claiming that the legislation they passed and implemented is unconstitutional. The courts will not punish the voters for following the instructions in their state because of sloppy legislation. They may suspend mail in voting for future elections until the legislature can refine legislation and/or amend the state constitution, but they will not do as requested by the plaintiff and nullify 2.5M votes cast based on the state's instructions or send the election to the state legislature. The first option is a vulgar civil rights violation, the second is a violation of PA Constitution Article VII, Section 13 (Courts determine contested elections, not legislatures). Had the suit been brought up in a timely fashion after it was adopted in October 2019, voters would have known to vote in person or by traditional absentee ballot instead.
If you're candidates only path to victory is the following:
PA GOP passes Act 77.
PA GOP Senate lists Act 77 as an accomplishment in their year-in-review.
PA bi-partisan government implements Act 77 and with it mail in voting.
PA voters vote in compliance with bi-partisan implementation of Act 77.
Trump comes up short.
PA GOP now claims Act 77 and their instructions to voters were unconstitutional.
Toss out 2.5M Americans' votes.
And your candidate is willing to pursue that path, then your candidate is pathetic and more interested in obtaining power than fair elections.
Accepting ballots past election day is not a violation of federal election law, not unique to PA, nor something new. Votes have to be postmarked by election day, proving they were cast by election day. Votes received in PA in the 3 days following Nov 3 have been kept separate from the vote tallies and are not enough to change the outcome.
Biden doesn't need PA to win anyways.