This is so true. But this is a massive fraud and much of the evidence is also far too massive to present. And a lot of the evidence while massive is also been destroyed. For example Pennsylvania began destroying the envelopes of the mail-in ballots. It was the envelopes that had the people's names and signatures on them. The ballots themselves have no identifying markers as to who did it or when or where they came from.
I don't know all the fancy rules about submitting evidence in court but I've heard that you should try to have as much as you can before you start and that constantly reintroducing new evidence becomes tedious and pointless.
As I understand it it will be submitted to court next week. I am with you on the frustration of not knowing what will happen. I'm not going to lie to you, some days this feels like a tease. But there are several different spearheads on this effort and there does seem like they really have something.
After the Mullier probe and the countless bombshells and explosive material that never came forward this is a bit nerve-wracking.
But what I would suggest to you is that instead of taking the media's word if there is no evidence and that there was no fraud that perhaps you look beyond the mainstream media at what has happened.
I hear them say a thousand times over that it is all without evidence. But having all of our elections somehow been without corruption or that there is no evidence when there has been accusations of corruption? Like isn't that weird do you? That the most powerful seats in the world are fought over and somehow no one has committed a fraud or at least tried? Do you really have that kind of faith in our politicians?
At 3:00 in the morning on November 4th Trump was winning Pennsylvania by almost 600,000 votes. Suddenly about 600,000 votes came in and 570,000 them were for Biden and 3,200 were for Trump. By the time the county was done Trump's more than a half a million vote lead gone down to a few thousand vote loss. Now I know that your confirmation bias is that there's no fraud here. But just run the numbers in your head and see if they make sense. Does any demographic really vote 99.5% in One direction?
You need to know that I do respect your opinion on many things. You have a lot of wisdom and insight. So it actually surprises me That You Don't see or are unwilling to see the fraud here. Or even at the very least the possibility of the fraud. It's not actually fraud until it is proven in court. And so when they say that there is no proof of fraud that is true. There is no proof. But there is so much evidence that it's overwhelming. In some states depending on what level you were at all the Democratic contenders received an extra 35,000 votes that cannot be accounted for. Now I'm sure that the local township manager didn't get an extra 35,000 but the senators and the Congress people did.
But it isn't proof until it has been processed by the courts. That is coming next week. I hope for America's sake that they prove that it's fraud. Because if they don't, their probably won't be another election. Too many people believe this is wrong. And if it simply gets wiped under the carpet who knows what will happen next.
It's a tricky place to defend. I know that the government has protected the concept of a secure elections at the expense of countless cases and evidences of fraud. They are never worth casting doubt on the election. Thousands upon thousands of vote harvesters have been identified. These are people who go about collecting or harvesting people's votes in a way that they get to decide how they're cast. So say that the city mayor wants to get re-elected but isn't particularly popular. Maybe through traditional means they can get within 5%. They hire these vote harvesters to take them over the finish line at quite an extraordinary rate. These people do this all year long. The payday may be into the hundreds of thousands. It might only be a few thousand depending on if the candidate only needs a few hundred votes. But these frauds aren't about casting the entire election but just enough to tip the balance. And that's what happened in all of the toss-up States. Trump was winning big and then all of a sudden at sometime in the middle of the night the winds changed and he lost by a few.
Trump went out in full force to gather his supporters. Support like has never been seen before for a president came out. He won more votes than any sitting president in history. Yet to beat that, the guy that sat in the basement, had to win even more votes than that breaking the record yet again.
I know that such a unlikely circumstance isn't enough to overturn the election. However, it appears that whoever did this had to inject so many votes into the machines and into the counting process that it was impossible to hide what they were doing. The Republican poll watchers were physically ejected from the sites. Pennsylvania passed three laws just days before the election. They extended the voting time, removed the signature validation requirement, and blocked Republican poll workers from observing the county processes.
I know it seems that we are trying to undermine the election process but we are actually trying to defend it. We don't trust it and we haven't trusted it for years and now we know that we were right. If there can't be Justice their probably won't be another election.
