Baptismal confirmation and priesthood

Discussions toward a better understanding of LDS doctrine, history, and culture. Discussion of Christianity, religion, and faith in general is welcome.
Post Reply
User avatar
2bizE
Posts: 2463
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:33 pm

Baptismal confirmation and priesthood

Post by 2bizE »

Why does a person with the MP have to do a confirmation after a person is baptized (with the AP)? Why can’t someone with AP do it?
~2bizE
User avatar
wtfluff
Posts: 3687
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:20 pm
Location: Worshiping Gravity / Pulling Taffy

Re: Baptismal confirmation and priesthood

Post by wtfluff »

Don't know if there is any other reference as to which priesthood has the magick powers for the confirmation incantation other than the Holy Handook™

COJCOLd$-Inc. General Handbook, section 18.8.1:
Who Performs the Ordinance
The ordinance of confirmation is performed by Melchizedek Priesthood holders. The one who acts as voice must be approved by the bishop (or by the mission president if a full-time missionary is performing the confirmation).

Only a Melchizedek Priesthood holder who is temple worthy may act as voice for a confirmation. However, a bishop may allow a father who holds the Melchizedek Priesthood to stand in the circle for the confirmation of his child even if the father is not fully temple worthy (see 18.3).

At least one member of the bishopric participates in this ordinance. When missionary elders have taught a convert, the bishop invites them to participate.

To act as voice in this ordinance, a person who is outside his own ward must show a current temple recommend to the presiding leader. Or he may show a Recommend to Perform an Ordinance signed by a member of his bishopric.
Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. -Frater Ravus

IDKSAF -RubinHighlander

Gave up who I am for who you wanted me to be...
User avatar
2bizE
Posts: 2463
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:33 pm

Re: Baptismal confirmation and priesthood

Post by 2bizE »

wtfluff wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 5:31 pm Don't know if there is any other reference as to which priesthood has the magick powers for the confirmation incantation other than the Holy Handook™

COJCOLd$-Inc. General Handbook, section 18.8.1:
Who Performs the Ordinance
The ordinance of confirmation is performed by Melchizedek Priesthood holders. The one who acts as voice must be approved by the bishop (or by the mission president if a full-time missionary is performing the confirmation).

Only a Melchizedek Priesthood holder who is temple worthy may act as voice for a confirmation. However, a bishop may allow a father who holds the Melchizedek Priesthood to stand in the circle for the confirmation of his child even if the father is not fully temple worthy (see 18.3).

At least one member of the bishopric participates in this ordinance. When missionary elders have taught a convert, the bishop invites them to participate.

To act as voice in this ordinance, a person who is outside his own ward must show a current temple recommend to the presiding leader. Or he may show a Recommend to Perform an Ordinance signed by a member of his bishopric.
So, to allow a person entry into the Kong’s of God it is fine for an AAronic priesthood holder to grant this, but to become a member of the church requires a MP holder. Somewhere a notary public should also be involved...
~2bizE
User avatar
wtfluff
Posts: 3687
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:20 pm
Location: Worshiping Gravity / Pulling Taffy

Re: Baptismal confirmation and priesthood

Post by wtfluff »

2bizE wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 6:19 pm
wtfluff wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 5:31 pm Don't know if there is any other reference as to which priesthood has the magick powers for the confirmation incantation other than the Holy Handook™

COJCOLd$-Inc. General Handbook, section 18.8.1:
Who Performs the Ordinance
The ordinance of confirmation is performed by Melchizedek Priesthood holders. The one who acts as voice must be approved by the bishop (or by the mission president if a full-time missionary is performing the confirmation).

Only a Melchizedek Priesthood holder who is temple worthy may act as voice for a confirmation. However, a bishop may allow a father who holds the Melchizedek Priesthood to stand in the circle for the confirmation of his child even if the father is not fully temple worthy (see 18.3).

At least one member of the bishopric participates in this ordinance. When missionary elders have taught a convert, the bishop invites them to participate.

To act as voice in this ordinance, a person who is outside his own ward must show a current temple recommend to the presiding leader. Or he may show a Recommend to Perform an Ordinance signed by a member of his bishopric.
So, to allow a person entry into the Kong’s of God it is fine for an AAronic priesthood holder to grant this, but to become a member of the church requires a MP holder. Somewhere a notary public should also be involved...
Slow down there Fella! If you go that far, Kirton|McConkie might have to get involved. The Lard's Holy, full service commercial law firm has much more important tasks to take care of. That would also be expen$ive.
Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. -Frater Ravus

IDKSAF -RubinHighlander

Gave up who I am for who you wanted me to be...
User avatar
Palerider
Posts: 2278
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2016 8:44 am

Re: Baptismal confirmation and priesthood

Post by Palerider »

I think the church assumes the ancient Apostles were the only ones with priesthood authority to give the gift of the Holy Ghost and their authority was not accompanied by the "Aaronic" priesthood as an appendage as in today's church.

The pseudopigraphical 3rd Nephi 18:37 kind of confirms this.

"And the multitude heard not the words which he spake, therefore they did not bear record; but the disciples bare record that he gave them power to give the Holy Ghost. And I will show unto you hereafter that this record is true."
"There is but one straight course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it steadily."

"Truth will ultimately prevail where there is pains to bring it to light."

George Washington
User avatar
nibbler
Posts: 973
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:12 pm

Re: Baptismal confirmation and priesthood

Post by nibbler »

Matthew 3:11 comes to mind:
I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire:
John the Baptist had authority to baptize but acknowledged that someone mightier (Jesus) was required to "baptize" with the holy ghost.
We don’t see things as they are, we see them as we are.
– Anais Nin
User avatar
Hagoth
Posts: 7304
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:13 pm

Re: Baptismal confirmation and priesthood

Post by Hagoth »

A Warlock outranks an Enchanter and can both cast out spirits and cast them IN.
“The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also.” -Mark Twain

Jesus: "The Kingdom of God is within you." The Buddha: "Be your own light."
Post Reply