A sneak peak of the first chapter of the next Saints book is out.
Chapter 1 (lds.org)
I've only read part of it so far, and it definitely feels light and fluffy, much like the first book.
jfro18, I'm looking forward to you analysis!
Saints 2: No Unhallowed Hand
Saints 2: No Unhallowed Hand
Well, I'm better than dirt! Ah, well... most kinds of dirt; not that fancy store-bought dirt; that stuff is loaded with nutrients. I can't compete with that stuff. -Moe Sizlack
Re: Saints 2: No Unhallowed Hand
I don't think I can do another Saints book - doing the first one was such a grind!
Although I would enjoy documenting it with adding in all of the ways that Brigham Young was an absolute monster, and watching to see how the church conveniently skirts around Adam-God, blood atonement, Brigham's insane racism, sexism, and wealth accumulation.
I was wondering if they'd get them out quickly - it looks like they're going to try getting them out once a year maybe. Inoculate early and often!
edit: Maybe I will have to do a shorter version - this paragraph in the first chapter is insanity:
One more question - has anyone ever documented what percentage of early Nauvoo sealings were polyagmous? I had thought it was a pretty high number, yet Saints gives this description:
Although I would enjoy documenting it with adding in all of the ways that Brigham Young was an absolute monster, and watching to see how the church conveniently skirts around Adam-God, blood atonement, Brigham's insane racism, sexism, and wealth accumulation.
I was wondering if they'd get them out quickly - it looks like they're going to try getting them out once a year maybe. Inoculate early and often!
edit: Maybe I will have to do a shorter version - this paragraph in the first chapter is insanity:
No mention whatsoever that the church claimed the Native Americans were the literal Book of Mormon descendants, no mention that the Saints felt they knew a LOT about the 'Indians' because they were Lamanites. Am I wrong or is this just a complete rewrite of Mormon history?Over the years, the Saints had tried to share the gospel with American Indians in the United States, and they planned to do the same with the Native peoples of the West. Like most white people in the United States, many white Saints saw their culture as superior to that of the Indians and knew little about their languages and customs. But they also viewed Indians as fellow members of the house of Israel and potential allies, and they hoped to forge friendships with the Utes, Shoshones, and other western tribes.16
One more question - has anyone ever documented what percentage of early Nauvoo sealings were polyagmous? I had thought it was a pretty high number, yet Saints gives this description:
Though the temple as a whole remained undedicated, they had already dedicated its attic and administered the endowment there to more than five thousand eager Saints. They had also sealed approximately thirteen hundred couples for time and eternity.25 Some of these sealings were plural marriages, which a few faithful Saints had begun practicing privately in Nauvoo following a principle the Lord had revealed to Joseph Smith in the early 1830s.26
- nehor90210
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 6:25 pm
Re: Saints 2: No Unhallowed Hand
I could read it if it were subtitled "Saints 2: The Legend of Brigham's Gold".
"On this spot I'll fight no more forever. Come and get me, you bastards!"
- Not Buying It
- Posts: 1308
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:29 pm
Re: Saints 2: No Unhallowed Hand
If they are going to talk about relations between the early Saints and the Native Americans, I wonder if there will be any mention of the Circleville Massacre (http://www.blackhawkproductions.com/circleville.htm), or how the Mormons tried to scapegoat the Paiutes for Mountain Meadows. Relations between the Native Americans and the Mormon settlers weren’t all bad, but they weren’t all good either.jfro18 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:11 am
No mention whatsoever that the church claimed the Native Americans were the literal Book of Mormon descendants, no mention that the Saints felt they knew a LOT about the 'Indians' because they were Lamanites. Am I wrong or is this just a complete rewrite of Mormon history?
"The truth is elegantly simple. The lie needs complex apologia. 4 simple words: Joe made it up. It answers everything with the perfect simplicity of Occam's Razor. Every convoluted excuse withers." - Some guy on Reddit called disposazelph
Re: Saints 2: No Unhallowed Hand
I am curious to see what they say about MM. They can't just ignore it. I don't see how you can talk about it without mentioning the attempted scapegoating that still continues today.Not Buying It wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 5:33 amIf they are going to talk about relations between the early Saints and the Native Americans, I wonder if there will be any mention of the Circleville Massacre (http://www.blackhawkproductions.com/circleville.htm), or how the Mormons tried to scapegoat the Paiutes for Mountain Meadows. Relations between the Native Americans and the Mormon settlers weren’t all bad, but they weren’t all good either.jfro18 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:11 am
No mention whatsoever that the church claimed the Native Americans were the literal Book of Mormon descendants, no mention that the Saints felt they knew a LOT about the 'Indians' because they were Lamanites. Am I wrong or is this just a complete rewrite of Mormon history?
- Just This Guy
- Posts: 1549
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2016 3:30 pm
- Location: Almost Heaven
Re: Saints 2: No Unhallowed Hand
Not Buying It wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 5:33 amIf they are going to talk about relations between the early Saints and the Native Americans, I wonder if there will be any mention of the Circleville Massacre (http://www.blackhawkproductions.com/circleville.htm), or how the Mormons tried to scapegoat the Paiutes for Mountain Meadows. Relations between the Native Americans and the Mormon settlers weren’t all bad, but they weren’t all good either.jfro18 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:11 am
No mention whatsoever that the church claimed the Native Americans were the literal Book of Mormon descendants, no mention that the Saints felt they knew a LOT about the 'Indians' because they were Lamanites. Am I wrong or is this just a complete rewrite of Mormon history?
Then there is the whole thing about JSjr (in the months before he will killed) trying to organize the native tribes to follow his lead and take the Midwest back from the US government. Can't get into his plans for open rebellion, can we...?
"The story so far: In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move." -- Douglas Adams
Re: Saints 2: No Unhallowed Hand
My prediction of their review of MMM:
"Some members erroneously felt that it was their duty to exact revenge on gentiles from the mid-west for Joseph Smith's murder. Acting alone and against recommendations from leaders like Brigham Young a few people attacked settlers attempting to cross the Utah territory. Unfortunately, these actions resulted in the deaths of several people on both sides of the argument. Some records indicate the local Native American tribes were also involved.
While saints in the outer settlements were struggling with these balances, church members in Salt Lake City continued to be blessed by the hand of the Lord..."
Well, I'm better than dirt! Ah, well... most kinds of dirt; not that fancy store-bought dirt; that stuff is loaded with nutrients. I can't compete with that stuff. -Moe Sizlack
Re: Saints 2: No Unhallowed Hand
Also need to add something about how the saints in the area heroically saved children who were left without parents from the violence, giving them new homes, families, and the invaluable gift of the restored and true Gospel of Jesus Christ.græy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 10:31 amMy prediction of their review of MMM:
"Some members erroneously felt that it was their duty to exact revenge on gentiles from the mid-west for Joseph Smith's murder. Acting alone and against recommendations from leaders like Brigham Young a few people attacked settlers attempting to cross the Utah territory. Unfortunately, these actions resulted in the deaths of several people on both sides of the argument. Some records indicate the local Native American tribes were also involved.
While saints in the outer settlements were struggling with these balances, church members in Salt Lake City continued to be blessed by the hand of the Lord..."
Well, I'm better than dirt! Ah, well... most kinds of dirt; not that fancy store-bought dirt; that stuff is loaded with nutrients. I can't compete with that stuff. -Moe Sizlack
Re: Saints 2: No Unhallowed Hand
You're probably correct. But maybe, just maybe, some enlightened soul will say something that directs modern readers to one reasonable lesson from this horrifying incident. It could be a lesson about:
- Use good judgement and the influence of the Holy Ghost when a leader asks you to do something
- Do not following a leader that encourages you to commit a felony
- This is an example of what happens when leadership decisions are made without communication or oversight
It also is unlikely to be noted how John D. Lee's Second Anointing blessings were restored some years later. This is a near explicit absolution for First Degree Murder with a promise of exaltation.