So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
No magic anymore...we're all just muggles now.
“For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.”
― Carl Sagan
― Carl Sagan
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
I need to get me a divining rod/rock and hat starter kit to take to SS. That could help better understand the lessons. Anyone know when the divining rods went out of fashion with church leaders?
I've added a link where you too can get your own divining rod from Amazon.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01I0E1TOS?psc=1
I've added a link where you too can get your own divining rod from Amazon.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01I0E1TOS?psc=1
~2bizE
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
Here is one place they still somewhat exist: The Coffin Canes of Joseph Smith. They were supposed to have powers to heal and probably do other things normally attributed to the Melchizedek priesthood. The Daughters of the Utah Pioneers have one on display at their museum.2bizE wrote:I need to get me a divining rod/rock and hat starter kit to take to SS. That could help better understand the lessons. Anyone know when the divining rods went out of fashion with church leaders?
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
I did not know about the coffin canes. Interesting how early leaders claimed the canes had magical powers perhaps like moses' staff.Corsair wrote:Here is one place they still somewhat exist: The Coffin Canes of Joseph Smith. They were supposed to have powers to heal and probably do other things normally attributed to the Melchizedek priesthood. The Daughters of the Utah Pioneers have one on display at their museum.2bizE wrote:I need to get me a divining rod/rock and hat starter kit to take to SS. That could help better understand the lessons. Anyone know when the divining rods went out of fashion with church leaders?
~2bizE
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
Even if the coffin cane doesn't heal, it's good for hitting pit-Bulls when they hump your leg.
If I'm a bird, why can't I fly?
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
So they should have been given to Brigham's and Heber's wives?Zadok wrote:Even if the coffin cane doesn't heal, it's good for hitting pit-Bulls when they hump your leg.
“The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also.” -Mark Twain
Jesus: "The Kingdom of God is within you." The Buddha: "Be your own light."
Jesus: "The Kingdom of God is within you." The Buddha: "Be your own light."
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
Whatever powers that might be attributed to canes, I am confident that this would not be part of their expected abilities. Surely the treatment of women in D&C 132 would not be mitigated simply by canes from Joseph's coffin.Hagoth wrote:So they should have been given to Brigham's and Heber's wives?Zadok wrote:Even if the coffin cane doesn't heal, it's good for hitting pit-Bulls when they hump your leg.
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
Corsair wrote:Hagoth wrote:
This leads to crucial problem that appears to be unresolvable. How would we tell that the "loose" vs. "tight" translation of prayers/scripture/ordinances is correct? Mormons are incessantly concerned about the supreme importance of ordinances. How could we possibly detect that some "ordinance" did not work? If exact verbiage is crucial for salvation, then exact policing of ordinances needs to be controlled and somehow "tested" for accuracy. If some loose variance is allowed, then why are Mormons so profoundly confident that other baptisms are wrong? How could we determine that Catholics, Methodists, Baptists, and those polygamous FLDS are wrong and the ordinances must be performed by the explicit authority of the institutional LDS church headed by Tom Monson? How would we ever actually know?
I think you are dead on in this point Corsair, and it leads to the important challenge about the church in general. If it is the actual kingdom of god, then we dammmmmmwelllll better be exact, get every word right, believe everything literally, and kill ourselves being obedient to every word which comes down from the mountain. However, we then have to decide that we can't be too literal, because then we would have to believe the world was created in seven days, the ark saved all animal and plant life now on the earth, people live on the moon,JS and his DW emma were a happy couple, the book of Abraham is a correctly translated book of scripture, etc. etc. ad nauseum. You also have to decide who's incantations you have to believe. Never the dead prophet's but only the living ones.
I believe magic is alive and well in all truly believing members. Blessings which are only valid if done by a "worthy" male priesthood holder surely bring magical er, miraculous results, young elders and sisters speak with the magical gift of tongues, and our bodies are magically protected by all kinds of nasty things if we wear the proper armor of god.
If we don't eat or drink the devil's substances like an espresso (yum) then we can run and not be weary and leap large buildings in a single bound.
If we pay our toll, we will have more money then we can carry around with a wheel barrow. If we just do it all, and give it all until we die, god will magically give us everything he has and allow us all to do this to our zillions of children. Used to make me feel all happy inside but now I just feel like I need to hurl.
Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and right doing, there is a field. I'll meet you there.
Rumi
Rumi
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
That's the way it was in 12th grade play practice. If you didn't get the line right the drama teacher made you do it over until you got it right.Hagoth wrote: If Harry Potter has taught us anything it's that you have to say the words just right for the magic to work.
If I'm a bird, why can't I fly?
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
I was taught that a gentleman does not discuss loose vs tight in public.Hagoth wrote:This leads to crucial problem that appears to be unresolvable. How would we tell that the "loose" vs. "tight" translation of prayers/scripture/ordinances is correct?
If I'm a bird, why can't I fly?
- Spicy McHaggis
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:14 pm
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
You can discuss it in a bishop's office though.Zadok wrote:I was taught that a gentleman does not discuss loose vs tight in public.Hagoth wrote:This leads to crucial problem that appears to be unresolvable. How would we tell that the "loose" vs. "tight" translation of prayers/scripture/ordinances is correct?
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
There is increasing concern over bishops sending out text messages to youths concerning their "tight vs. loose" application of LDS moral standards.Zadok wrote:You can discuss it in a bishop's office though.Spicy McHaggis wrote:I was taught that a gentleman does not discuss loose vs tight in public.
- Not Buying It
- Posts: 1308
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:29 pm
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
As though closed door meetings alone with adolescents to talk about sexual behaviors shouldn't have been enough to prompt increasing concerns. What a weird organization I belong to. Anyway, I've seen some things here and there in discussion groups about bishops sending texts to youth, is this a concern that is going to gain any traction, or just another inappropriate thing we all get to lament here without much more attention being paid to it?Corsair wrote:There is increasing concern over bishops sending out text messages to youths concerning their "tight vs. loose" application of LDS moral standards.Zadok wrote:You can discuss it in a bishop's office though.Spicy McHaggis wrote:I was taught that a gentleman does not discuss loose vs tight in public.
"The truth is elegantly simple. The lie needs complex apologia. 4 simple words: Joe made it up. It answers everything with the perfect simplicity of Occam's Razor. Every convoluted excuse withers." - Some guy on Reddit called disposazelph
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
There has been a call on Reddit to document and screenshot if your bishop has texted you any "worthiness" questions. This is definitely something that could end up being a news worthy embarrassment to the LDS church. I can easily see that bishops and ward leaders get an injunction to cut that out because it is material evidence that could show up in a civil lawsuit.Not Buying It wrote:As though closed door meetings alone with adolescents to talk about sexual behaviors shouldn't have been enough to prompt increasing concerns. What a weird organization I belong to. Anyway, I've seen some things here and there in discussion groups about bishops sending texts to youth, is this a concern that is going to gain any traction, or just another inappropriate thing we all get to lament here without much more attention being paid to it?
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
It works - sometimes - because it's based on the placebo effect mostly.wtfluff wrote:This. ^^MoPag wrote:Or consecrated oil, or bread and water that have been blessed with priesthood power. It's all magic. Just not magic you are familiar with.Spicy McHaggis wrote:Just as believable as seer stones.
It's ALL based on magic. (Which is why it doesn't work.)
Yet, who of us can say we understand every possibility in every dimension of quantum mechanics and other unseen but real influences?
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
So you're telling me there's a chance!Newme wrote:It works - sometimes - because it's based on the placebo effect mostly.wtfluff wrote:This. ^^MoPag wrote: Or consecrated oil, or bread and water that have been blessed with priesthood power. It's all magic. Just not magic you are familiar with.
It's ALL based on magic. (Which is why it doesn't work.)
Gonna have to remember this when my Alzheimer's kicks in. Then again, it's Alzheimer's, so remembering might be a problem...
Last edited by wtfluff on Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. -Frater Ravus
IDKSAF -RubinHighlander
Gave up who I am for who you wanted me to be...
IDKSAF -RubinHighlander
Gave up who I am for who you wanted me to be...
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
"Land o' Goshen, Heber! It's 1 AM. Where's you all been?"Zadok wrote:I was taught that a gentleman does not discuss loose vs tight in public.
"Just out getting tight, Vilate."
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha
-- Moksha
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
The natural continuation of this satirical dialog gets creepy really quickly, involving the euphemism "a few months shy of fifteen".moksha wrote:"Land o' Goshen, Heber! It's 1 AM. Where's you all been?"
"Just out getting tight, Vilate."
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
wtfluff wrote:So you're telling me there's a chance!Newme wrote:It works - sometimes - because it's based on the placebo effect mostly.wtfluff wrote: This. ^^
It's ALL based on magic. (Which is why it doesn't work.)
Gonna have to remember this when my Alzheimer's kicks in. Then again, it's Alzheimer's, so remembering might be a problem...
Still, you remind me of what I often wonder: Why do so many ignore the placebo effect?
The placebo effect is not some magic that has no influence - it's real - real enough that FDA requires medications be tested against it.
Re: So is magic officially part of the gospel now?
Will the placebo effect actually help when my Alzheimer's kicks in?Newme wrote:wtfluff wrote:So you're telling me there's a chance!Newme wrote: It works - sometimes - because it's based on the placebo effect mostly.
Gonna have to remember this when my Alzheimer's kicks in. Then again, it's Alzheimer's, so remembering might be a problem...
Still, you remind me of what I often wonder: Why do so many ignore the placebo effect?
The placebo effect is not some magic that has no influence - it's real - real enough that FDA requires medications be tested against it.
Can the placebo effect cure cancer?
I think we both know the answer to those two questions. I do believe the placebo effect can "help" a bit in some situations. I also know that the placebo effect cannot in fact cure diseases like Alzheimer's and cancer. Neither can magic oil, or magic incantations combined with magic oil, or magic wands (rods of Aaron,) or magic rocks, or "prophets seers and revelators," or asking an invisible alien with super-powers who lives near kolob.
Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. -Frater Ravus
IDKSAF -RubinHighlander
Gave up who I am for who you wanted me to be...
IDKSAF -RubinHighlander
Gave up who I am for who you wanted me to be...