I don't have *personal* experience either, but when my daughter got into a threesome, I told her it wouldn't last because there is a lack of equality in a threesome. She tried to explain to me the difference between polygamy and polyamory and I told her the same thing applies and I didn't care if she and the other woman were having sex, either the split would be along the married couple side, or the split would be the two women ganging up on the guy, or the split would be that she would start to feel betrayed that he had a relationship with her that was something more that what he had with my daughter. But there is a power imballance in a threesome and they almost never last because somebody gets unhappy. They may stay because they feel trapped, but that does not mean the relationship is working. When the other two decided it was time to get pregnant without talking to her, she felt betrayed. The other woman decided she didn't want to raise a baby with *him* and went home to mama, and my daughter decided to divorce him because she couldn't trust him. But for about six months, they were all happy.Jeffret wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 1:11 pmI don't have personal experience, but do any of these qualify?Not Buying It wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 12:12 pm But as I said in my post in the other thread, where has there ever been a group that practiced polygamy where it wasn’t coercive, abusive, and generally just bad for a substantial number of the women in the group?
More Than Two
What It's Like to Be in a Polyamorous Relationship
Married, With Infidelities
Dating experts explain polyamory and open relationships
How to Make Polyamorous Relationships Work
New Sexual Revolution: Polyamory May Be Good for You
Keep in mind that I'm not advocating for any of these situations nor am I interested in any of these polyamorous relationships any more than I'm interested in a gay relationship (both of those come in a zero interest). I just think the earlier statement is overreaching. In a closed or semi-closed group it may be true, but I'm not convinced it is as certain for a minority situation in a larger group. I'd have to deny what these people share to make that claim and I don't know how I can do that any better in this case than with any other number of subgroups or characteristics in which I lack personal experience.
So, my opinion is that these relationships are inherently unstable, although they may claim it is bliss. It is like mixed orientation marriages, there is a built in instability.
But then, I don't think men are "genetically programmed" to live polygamy because they can never keep all the wives happy, and if they are not forced by law, culture, supporting children, or something the unhappy wives will leave. Seals who are genetically programmed to be polygamous don't have the problem of keeping the wives happy. Being the biggest baddest male keeps the wives happy. Human women do not have "the biggest baddest male" as their top priority. Human women look for the ability to protect and provide for children and what kind of father the guy will make, and polygamy lessens those traits.