Liberal General Authorities?

Discussions toward a better understanding of LDS doctrine, history, and culture. Discussion of Christianity, religion, and faith in general is welcome.
Post Reply
User avatar
deacon blues
Posts: 2083
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:37 am

Liberal General Authorities?

Post by deacon blues »

I decided to start this after reading the thread "How much does the Prophet really matter?" The process of choosing General Authorities seems to strongly favor conservative candidates. People like Lowell Bennion, and O.C. Tanner were brilliant, ground-breaking leaders, but they were not church-broke, GA material. Have there been any liberal General Authorities since Hugh B. Brown?
God is Love. God is Truth. The greatest problem with organized religion is that the organization becomes god, rather than a means of serving God.
User avatar
RubinHighlander
Posts: 1906
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 7:20 am
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: Liberal General Authorities?

Post by RubinHighlander »

DFU was probably was probably in the same solar system as liberal, but still an outer planet and we see what happened to him. Doesn't look like anything will change anytime soon.
“Sir,' I said to the universe, 'I exist.' 'That,' said the universe, 'creates no sense of obligation in me whatsoever.”
--Douglas Adams

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzmYP3PbfXE
User avatar
deacon blues
Posts: 2083
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:37 am

Re: Liberal General Authorities?

Post by deacon blues »

I do not mean political liberal or conservative. Sadly, the word liberal gets a bad rap. It's almost as volatile as the word 'cult' here in Utah.

I Should have labeled this thread "Theologically Liberal General Authorities." What I mean by theologically liberal, is a person who would say, "You don't have to believe exactly as I do," while a theologically conservative would say, "my understanding is right, or my world view is the only real world view. That's why I used the examples of someone like Lowell Bennion and O.C. Tanner, who were known as, "swearing Elders" opposed to a Bruce McConkie. Check out this article. https://www.sunstonemagazine.com/pdf/053-08-13.pdf Where are the "Swearing Elders" of today. Certainly not in leadership! And where are the "Swearing Sisters?"
God is Love. God is Truth. The greatest problem with organized religion is that the organization becomes god, rather than a means of serving God.
User avatar
2bizE
Posts: 2480
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:33 pm

Re: Liberal General Authorities?

Post by 2bizE »

Hinckley was a journalists. Journalists are mostly Democrat. Democrats are mostly liberal. So, maybe Hinckley in his own way. Certainly was brave to speak with the press.

Also, JS was liberal, at least with his wives.
~2bizE
User avatar
Rob4Hope
Posts: 1359
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 1:43 pm
Location: Salt Lake City -- the Motherland!!

Re: Liberal General Authorities?

Post by Rob4Hope »

At this point I think they are all virtually Church Broke or they wouldn't be there.

For a while there I thought the Bednar was the guy...he was the one to show kindness and tolerance. Oh, how I was disappointed.

I use to think Marvin J. Ashton was the kind one. He gave some VERY conservative talks, and those talks now serve as very good tools to show hypocrisy in the leading authorities, particular Ashton's talk on telling lies.

The who ideal of "conservative" to me has less to do with thought conformity than it does with the idea that the ends justify the means, or that if you lie to protect "the good name of the church", then it ain't no lie.

God "justifies in committing a little sin"...as long as its for the Chruch.
User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5337
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Liberal General Authorities?

Post by moksha »

deacon blues wrote: Wed Mar 07, 2018 8:59 am People like Lowell Bennion, and O.C. Tanner were brilliant, ...
Lowell Bennion certainly impressed me as being brilliant, but his ethical stand that those of African descent should not be excluded from full participation in the LDS Church put him on the enemies list of the 'Brethren with impaired ethics'.
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha
Corsair
Posts: 3080
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:58 am
Location: Phoenix

Re: Liberal General Authorities?

Post by Corsair »

moksha wrote: Thu Mar 08, 2018 12:44 am Lowell Bennion certainly impressed me as being brilliant, but his ethical stand that those of African descent should not be excluded from full participation in the LDS Church put him on the enemies list of the 'Brethren with impaired ethics'.
Lowell Bennion was liberal AF. And by "AF", I mean "American Fork".
User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5337
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Liberal General Authorities?

Post by moksha »

Corsair wrote: Thu Mar 08, 2018 11:32 am Lowell Bennion was liberal AF. And by "AF", I mean "American Fork".
Could you explain the American Fork reference? If one is a liberal AF, what does that mean?
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha
User avatar
2bizE
Posts: 2480
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:33 pm

Re: Liberal General Authorities?

Post by 2bizE »

moksha wrote: Thu Mar 08, 2018 1:01 pm
Corsair wrote: Thu Mar 08, 2018 11:32 am Lowell Bennion was liberal AF. And by "AF", I mean "American Fork".
Could you explain the American Fork reference? If one is a liberal AF, what does that mean?
I had a Cobb salad recently in AF and they certainly applied a liberal amount of blue cheese dressing. They can be quite liberal in AF.
~2bizE
User avatar
Rob4Hope
Posts: 1359
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 1:43 pm
Location: Salt Lake City -- the Motherland!!

Re: Liberal General Authorities?

Post by Rob4Hope »

moksha wrote: Thu Mar 08, 2018 1:01 pm
Corsair wrote: Thu Mar 08, 2018 11:32 am Lowell Bennion was liberal AF. And by "AF", I mean "American Fork".
Could you explain the American Fork reference? If one is a liberal AF, what does that mean?
No LDS people in AF are liberal! The point of the mountain would slip off!
User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5337
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Liberal General Authorities?

Post by moksha »

Pen Guin wrote: Thu Mar 08, 2018 1:01 pm
Corsair wrote: Thu Mar 08, 2018 11:32 am Lowell Bennion was liberal AF. And by "AF", I mean "American Fork".
Could you explain the American Fork reference? If one is a liberal AF, what does that mean?
Hold on Mr. Guin, I suggest your age is showing and that you need to consult the Urban Dictionary to fully understand such abbreviations as AF.

Hope that helps.
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha
User avatar
1smartdodog
Posts: 510
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2017 5:51 pm

Re: Liberal General Authorities?

Post by 1smartdodog »

I am not convinced the church becoming more liberal would be good for the church. Would be good for certain members I am sure. But more members would be upset than happy. The reality is it is going to take a lot more than some liberal ideas to stop the bleeding. What that is I am not sure, but it is more than being a little more tolerant for certain lifestyles

The bigger problem is the church is boring the hell out of its members. I think more people leave because of boredom than any conservative policy.
“Five percent of the people think; ten percent of the people think they think; and the other eighty-five percent would rather die than think.”
― Thomas A. Edison
User avatar
Jeffret
Posts: 1037
Joined: Mon May 29, 2017 6:49 pm

Re: Liberal General Authorities?

Post by Jeffret »

1smartdodog wrote: Sun Mar 11, 2018 8:03 am I am not convinced the church becoming more liberal would be good for the church.
How would you define "good for the church"? And how would you know if such a thing had been achieved?
"Close your eyes, for your eyes will only tell the truth,
And the truth isn't what you want to see" (Charles Hart, "The Music of the Night")
User avatar
1smartdodog
Posts: 510
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2017 5:51 pm

Re: Liberal General Authorities?

Post by 1smartdodog »

Jeffret wrote: Sun Mar 11, 2018 10:17 am
1smartdodog wrote: Sun Mar 11, 2018 8:03 am I am not convinced the church becoming more liberal would be good for the church.
How would you define "good for the church"? And how would you know if such a thing had been achieved?
I am not defending the church or it policies. It’s just my opinion the church as an entity would lose as many members as it gains by going liberal. It is not a judgement of right or wrong just what reality is.
“Five percent of the people think; ten percent of the people think they think; and the other eighty-five percent would rather die than think.”
― Thomas A. Edison
User avatar
Jeffret
Posts: 1037
Joined: Mon May 29, 2017 6:49 pm

Re: Liberal General Authorities?

Post by Jeffret »

1smartdodog wrote: Sun Mar 11, 2018 8:11 pm
Jeffret wrote: Sun Mar 11, 2018 10:17 am
1smartdodog wrote: Sun Mar 11, 2018 8:03 am I am not convinced the church becoming more liberal would be good for the church.
How would you define "good for the church"? And how would you know if such a thing had been achieved?
I am not defending the church or it policies. It’s just my opinion the church as an entity would lose as many members as it gains by going liberal. It is not a judgement of right or wrong just what reality is.
Ah, if that's your measure, then I think I would agree with you. That's a value judgement -- that having more members is good for the church. I suspect lots of people would share that same value. I doubt that becoming more liberal would help them better retain more members. Or convert new ones. Though the evidence suggests their having some troubles with that anyway.

On the other hand, if they get too conservative, that may also drive away more members. If, as some people predict, Nelson takes the church in a more conservative, hard-line direction you may well see the exodus increase.
"Close your eyes, for your eyes will only tell the truth,
And the truth isn't what you want to see" (Charles Hart, "The Music of the Night")
Post Reply