Reasons for not criticizing church leaders

Discussions toward a better understanding of LDS doctrine, history, and culture. Discussion of Christianity, religion, and faith in general is welcome.
Post Reply
User avatar
2bizE
Posts: 2480
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:33 pm

Re: Reasons for not criticizing church leaders

Post by 2bizE »

I have always disliked this statement by Oaks. It grinds me to think that we should not criticize. But as I think about it more, I’m softening up in a few areas.
1) would I like people to criticize me as a scoutmaster? No. I could just quit if i wanted to. I’m not paid for this, so if you think you can do better, please take over....
2) What about constructive feedback? Yes, I wouldn’t mind feedback, if i could as those giving feedback to help share the load in a few areas.
3) Should senior leaders be criticized? Yes.
They are paid by our tithing. They are leaders of an organization that takes our money. Yes, they should have a mechanism for receiving criticism; should have a continuous improvement model.
~2bizE
Top
User avatar
wtfluff
Posts: 3698
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:20 pm
Location: Worshiping Gravity / Pulling Taffy

Re: Reasons for not criticizing church leaders

Post by wtfluff »

2bizE wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2018 2:50 pmThey are paid by our tithing. They are leaders of an organization that takes our money. Yes, they should have a mechanism for receiving criticism; should have a continuous improvement model.
Hmmm... Continuous improvement model? Well, the average age of the top-3-old-white-dudes on the board of directors has been continuously rising for a while, does that count?
Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. -Frater Ravus

IDKSAF -RubinHighlander

Gave up who I am for who you wanted me to be...
Top
User avatar
2bizE
Posts: 2480
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:33 pm

Re: Reasons for not criticizing church leaders

Post by 2bizE »

wtfluff wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2018 4:04 pm
2bizE wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2018 2:50 pmThey are paid by our tithing. They are leaders of an organization that takes our money. Yes, they should have a mechanism for receiving criticism; should have a continuous improvement model.
Hmmm... Continuous improvement model? Well, the average age of the top-3-old-white-dudes on the board of directors has been continuously rising for a while, does that count?
I think wisdom increases with age, until wisdom is replaced with senility. I think the top started the decline some time ago.
~2bizE
Top
User avatar
Meilingkie
Posts: 403
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:40 pm
Location: Tilburg
Contact:
Contact Meilingkie

Re: Reasons for not criticizing church leaders

Post by Meilingkie »

Continuous imporvement, they call it Revelation.
Lately I have been having many of them.

Like Uchtdorf being assigned to Europe, I know it 1 week before it was announced.
I call it logical thinking, many LDS I spoke call the same revelation.
"Getting the Mormon out of the Church is easier than getting the Mormon out of the Ex-Mormon"
Top
dogbite
Posts: 596
Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 1:28 pm
Location: SLC

Re: Reasons for not criticizing church leaders

Post by dogbite »

Meilingkie wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2018 6:39 am Continuous imporvement, they call it Revelation.
Lately I have been having many of them.

Like Uchtdorf being assigned to Europe, I know it 1 week before it was announced.
I call it logical thinking, many LDS I spoke call the same revelation.
It's setting him up to fail.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Doctrinal Discussion”