Utah Mormons don't "have their back" for Muslims

Discussions toward a better understanding of LDS doctrine, history, and culture. Discussion of Christianity, religion, and faith in general is welcome.
Post Reply
Korihor
Posts: 1239
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 10:37 am

Utah Mormons don't "have their back" for Muslims

Post by Korihor »

http://www.sltrib.com/news/4565608-156/ ... qus_thread

Yes, this is related to the current political activity. But I'm trying to steer is into the realm of doctrinal discussion.

A muslim leader in Utah is disappointed so many Mormon Utahns voted for Trump. He thought mormons would support an oppressed people given Mormons history. I'm torn on this. Did Mormons do what the felt was best or did they turn their backs on someone?

Let's just presume briefly that Mormons are really good at following orders, and the unofficial orders are to vote Republican. Can you blame someone that is doing what their supposed and doesn't know any better.
Reading can severely damage your ignorance.
User avatar
fh451
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 4:28 pm

Re: Utah Mormons don't "have their back" for Muslims

Post by fh451 »

I believe most Mormons thought they were "doing what is best" under utilitarian ethics - the ends justifies the means. This is in contrast to my DW who would not vote for you-know-who because of the example he would set as leader of the nation. It just depends on what is most important to you. I think Muslims are justified in thinking they had been snubbed and betrayed by an erstwhile ally, but I don't think Mormons did it with that thought in mind. They just want to make damsure the next supreme court justice (or 2 or 3) is conservative, and that justifies a lot for them.

fh451
User avatar
Red Ryder
Posts: 4185
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:14 pm

Re: Utah Mormons don't "have their back" for Muslims

Post by Red Ryder »

Mormons have only known one way which is to take care of themselves. In this case, as Fh451 mentioned it was in the form of republican conservatism.

Most Mormons I know don't personally know ANY Muslims. Why bother "looking out" for them at all? Especially since they haven't been told to by the prophet like he has with the refugees.
“It always devolves to Pantaloons. Always.” ~ Fluffy

“I switched baristas” ~ Lady Gaga

“Those who do not move do not notice their chains.” ~Rosa Luxemburg
User avatar
RubinHighlander
Posts: 1906
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 7:20 am
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: Utah Mormons don't "have their back" for Muslims

Post by RubinHighlander »

I know at least some of the older TBM generation may be prejudice against Muslims. Once in a HP meeting an old Irish guy testified that the Muslim faith was of the Devil; he had a lot of heads nodding his way. But I think the vote has more to do with an uneducated straight party conservative choice than it does with hating Muslims.
“Sir,' I said to the universe, 'I exist.' 'That,' said the universe, 'creates no sense of obligation in me whatsoever.”
--Douglas Adams

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzmYP3PbfXE
User avatar
glass shelf
Posts: 366
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: Utah Mormons don't "have their back" for Muslims

Post by glass shelf »

I think any member of a different religious group who thinks that Mormons would "have their back" fails to comprehend that Mormons are only interested in religious freedom when it includes and directly affects them. If you have similar goals and needs, then you've got a great alliance. If not, then tough luck. God touched their hearts to go a different way.
User avatar
Hagoth
Posts: 7339
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:13 pm

Re: Utah Mormons don't "have their back" for Muslims

Post by Hagoth »

I think Mormons were clearly and primarily voting against Hillary/Democrats. This is evidenced by the fact that McMullen was in the lead until the white supremacist robocall accused him of being gay and same-sex marriage tolerant, at which point the votes immediately jumped over to Trump, who they saw as less gay-tolerant, which is a bigger deal for them than his own grievous sexual/sexist behavior and attitudes (at least he's a confirmed heterosexual!)
“The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also.” -Mark Twain

Jesus: "The Kingdom of God is within you." The Buddha: "Be your own light."
User avatar
document
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 10:17 am

Re: Utah Mormons don't "have their back" for Muslims

Post by document »

This is evidenced by the fact that McMullen was in the lead until the white supremacist robocall accused him of being gay and same-sex marriage tolerant, at which point the votes immediately jumped over to Trump
I heard a few whispers of this among some LDS friends.
User avatar
AllieOop
Posts: 582
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:39 am
Location: Where the sand meets the Sea...

Re: Utah Mormons don't "have their back" for Muslims

Post by AllieOop »

document wrote:
This is evidenced by the fact that McMullen was in the lead until the white supremacist robocall accused him of being gay and same-sex marriage tolerant, at which point the votes immediately jumped over to Trump
I heard a few whispers of this among some LDS friends.
Yup. What I heard was from those who seemed more upset that he had "two Moms who were lesbians". I don't know if that's even true, but I found it interesting that they seemed to focus on that part rather than whether or not MuMullin himself was gay :roll:
"There came a time when the desire to know the truth about the church became stronger than the desire to know the church was true."
User avatar
glass shelf
Posts: 366
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: Utah Mormons don't "have their back" for Muslims

Post by glass shelf »

It is true that his mom is now married to another woman. It's irrelevant to whether or not he would have been a good president, but true.
User avatar
AllieOop
Posts: 582
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:39 am
Location: Where the sand meets the Sea...

Re: Utah Mormons don't "have their back" for Muslims

Post by AllieOop »

glass shelf wrote:It is true that his mom is now married to another woman. It's irrelevant to whether or not he would have been a good president, but true.
Ok, I hadn't checked that part out. I agree with you that it's irrelevant. I immediately thought of the new policy when I heard these members discussing that, though. Judging a child with gay parents...etc. (not that he's a child, but that's what it reminded me of).
"There came a time when the desire to know the truth about the church became stronger than the desire to know the church was true."
Korihor
Posts: 1239
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 10:37 am

Re: Utah Mormons don't "have their back" for Muslims

Post by Korihor »

glass shelf wrote:It is true that his mom is now married to another woman. It's irrelevant to whether or not he would have been a good president, but true.
I wasn't aware of this background.
A quick google search confirms the story and I read something about a guy that was a Trump supporter and made a bunch of Robo-calls defaming people in New Hampshire and the Trump campaign denounced him and said they were returning his $250 donation. It looks like this guy did another robo-call batch in Utah with this homophobic rhetoric and the Trump camp denounced it again.

I give credit to the Trump campaign if this is true. By my estimation, by the time the Trump camp found out about the robo-calls and denounced it, the damage was already done. This robo-caller guy really knows his audience. Utah is extremely fertile ground for a seed of homophobia.
Reading can severely damage your ignorance.
User avatar
GoodBoy
Posts: 410
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: Utah Mormons don't "have their back" for Muslims

Post by GoodBoy »

I do know a lot of Muslims. I have advised many PhD students and visiting scholars who are Muslims. We've had them out for dinner, and they've hosted my family for dinner a few times as well. I can vouch that they are not evil or significantly different from Christians. If fact I went to a mosque with some students and met with the Imam in his office for a while, and the Imam had a very obviously well-worn speech about how terrorists do not represent Islam any more than skin-heads represent Christianity.

I hope they can live in peace.
Always been the good kid, but I wanted to know more, and to find and test truth.
User avatar
shadow
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 4:07 pm

Re: Utah Mormons don't "have their back" for Muslims

Post by shadow »

https://www.lds.org/ensign/2000/08/a-la ... d?lang=eng

I still remember this fantastic ensign article from 2000. If there was ever anything prescient by the brethren, it was the need for this article as Islamaphobia was to take root over the next 15 years.
"Healing is impossible in loneliness; it is the opposite of loneliness. Conviviality is healing. To be healed we must come with all the other creates to the feast of Creation." --Wendell Berry
User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5335
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Utah Mormons don't "have their back" for Muslims

Post by moksha »

Hagoth wrote:This is evidenced by the fact that McMullen was in the lead until the white supremacist robocall accused him of being gay and same-sex marriage tolerant, at which point the votes immediately jumped over to Trump, who they saw as less gay-tolerant, which is a bigger deal for them than his own grievous sexual/sexist behavior and attitudes (at least he's a confirmed heterosexual!)
Guess this is an instance of the greater hatred overshadowing the smaller one.

That robocaller certainly knew how to appeal to the baser instincts of Mormons.
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha
Corsair
Posts: 3080
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:58 am
Location: Phoenix

Re: Utah Mormons don't "have their back" for Muslims

Post by Corsair »

Korihor wrote:A muslim leader in Utah is disappointed so many Mormon Utahns voted for Trump. He thought mormons would support an oppressed people given Mormons history. I'm torn on this. Did Mormons do what the felt was best or did they turn their backs on someone?
I can certainly empathize with the uncertainty felt by a minority group after an election like we just had. My lefty friends are still worried about the future. This Muslim leader is welcome to engage in political discussion. But the audience is also allowed to notice that he has expressed a false dichotomy cloaked in political rhetoric and has left out any supporting dielectic.

When faced with a very limited list of candidates, the average voting Mormon is going to evaluate their vote based on their values. It is no insult to a competing religious group to not vote how a Muslim leader would prefer they vote. It is simply human nature and the established democratic process.
Post Reply