NOMfrence stats

This is for encouragement, ideas, and support for people going through a faith transition no matter where you hope to end up. This is also the place to laugh, cry, and love together.
Post Reply
User avatar
MoPag
Posts: 3939
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2016 2:05 pm

NOMfrence stats

Post by MoPag »

NOMfrence stats:

Saturday Morning and Afternoon
DFU +15
Oscarson 0
Oaks -340 and -10,000 for every one of our LGBT brothers and sisters we lose in the next 6 months.
Pingree +5
D.Todd -5
Holland +15

Anderson -15
Owen 0
Rasband -15
Haleck 0
Nelson -80


Sunday Morning and Afternoon
Bingham +5
Halstrom -15
Bednar 0
Wodel +5
Zwick +25
Eyring -10

Ballard 0
Callister -201
Koch 0
Ellis 0
Parrella 0
Ardem -3
Alosno +2
Anderson -155

Things kind of flat lined at the beginning of the Sunday Afternoon. If anyone wants to make any changes, just comment below. For example: Callister was the guy who gave the talk about BOM and JS. He caused a lot of talk but no one on the NOM thread took any points from him.

I'll do a winners and losers post in a couple of days.
Last edited by MoPag on Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
...walked eye-deep in hell
believing in old men’s lies...--Ezra Pound
User avatar
MalcolmVillager
Posts: 703
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 8:01 pm

Re: NOMfrence stats

Post by MalcolmVillager »

Callister with his B.S. mansplaining of the BOM was a negative 176 for me.

Oaks sucks acorns. Absolute rubbish. Your scores appropriately.

Holland was surprisingly okay.

There were a few other high points and outside of boredom and general lack of inspiration or novelty, I would score conference in general, even general conference, a big old ladeefreakindaaaaa!
User avatar
Red Ryder
Posts: 4182
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:14 pm

Re: NOMfrence stats

Post by Red Ryder »

Darth Vader's word censor +500
“It always devolves to Pantaloons. Always.” ~ Fluffy

“I switched baristas” ~ Lady Gaga

“Those who do not move do not notice their chains.” ~Rosa Luxemburg
User avatar
FiveFingerMnemonic
Posts: 1484
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 2:50 pm
Contact:

Re: NOMfrence stats

Post by FiveFingerMnemonic »

MalcolmVillager wrote: Fri Oct 06, 2017 12:46 pm Callister with his B.S. mansplaining of the BOM was a negative 176 for me.

Oaks sucks acorns. Absolute rubbish. Your scores appropriately.

Holland was surprisingly okay.

There were a few other high points and outside of boredom and general lack of inspiration or novelty, I would score conference in general, even general conference, a big old ladeefreakindaaaaa!
I like to call Callister "Mustachio man" since he can't get rid of his stache shadow.
User avatar
Silver Girl
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 6:31 am

Re: NOMfrence stats

Post by Silver Girl »

Allow me to award Callister -25 for apologetics with zero fact or logic attached to it.

The guy who sucked up toward the end of the conference (I think he gushed about Nelson being "inspired" to go to the death bed of Hales) needs about -100 awareded for blatantly trying to audition to be appointed to the Q-12.
.
.
Silver Girl is sailing into the future. She is no longer scared.
User avatar
MalcolmVillager
Posts: 703
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 8:01 pm

Re: NOMfrence stats

Post by MalcolmVillager »

FiveFingerMnemonic wrote: Fri Oct 06, 2017 3:23 pm
MalcolmVillager wrote: Fri Oct 06, 2017 12:46 pm Callister with his B.S. mansplaining of the BOM was a negative 176 for me.

Oaks sucks acorns. Absolute rubbish. Your scores appropriately.

Holland was surprisingly okay.

There were a few other high points and outside of boredom and general lack of inspiration or novelty, I would score conference in general, even general conference, a big old ladeefreakindaaaaa!
I like to call Callister "Mustachio man" since he can't get rid of his stache shadow.
He looks like a who from Whoville!
User avatar
MalcolmVillager
Posts: 703
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 8:01 pm

Re: NOMfrence stats

Post by MalcolmVillager »

User avatar
MoPag
Posts: 3939
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2016 2:05 pm

Re: NOMfrence stats

Post by MoPag »

Silver Girl wrote: Sat Oct 07, 2017 11:12 am
The guy who sucked up toward the end of the conference (I think he gushed about Nelson being "inspired" to go to the death bed of Hales) needs about -100 awareded for blatantly trying to audition to be appointed to the Q-12.
It was actually Anderson, and although he is already a member of the 12, I think you are right that he was angling for a promotion. When Nelson finally comes into power he will need to appoint his counselors. The rest of his talk was a suck up to Nelson too.
...walked eye-deep in hell
believing in old men’s lies...--Ezra Pound
Post Reply