So now that we see that the Houston temple was not spared, but has flooded fairly badly, what are we supposed to think?
I know, I know.....it's a test.....the saints needed this to humble them.....they needed this experience to allow them to grow.....so either way, flood or no flood, miracle or no miracle, the church is still true.
But if it HAD been spared it would have been a miracle proving that the church is true. No doubt about that.

But then....if the church is still true regardless of which way the disaster goes....why broadcast the apparently miraculous events in the first place? That wouldn't be using the tool of sensationalism to manipulate members would it?
