
I like your humor, Moksha!
No doubt there's humor in every religion and its traditions.
My dad has this uber-Manichaean worldview going on--everything is about how Satan wants to destroy the Plan and agency. Literally, everything get funneled through that lens. It's hard to convince someone like that not to demonize--it's baked in.oliver_denom wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 7:46 am You don't have to hate or persecute people, claim the devil is in them, in order to disagree with their positions. That's where a lot of people seem to have difficulty. They disagree with the tenants of Islam, profoundly, but that doesn't mean their religion needs to be outlawed or demonized.
One night around a bonfire, I asked this Jewish guy (from1smartdodog wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2017 5:29 am I think any religion that tries to compel women to hide their beauty to the public is not good. Both Mormons and muslims do that constantly. I think it is oppressive to women and controlling.
This is the same argument the church uses to justify its modesty teachings. What is that even based on? Even if it were true, that men are more aroused by sight, then why does that justify covering women? Why don't they make men wear blindfolds? There's nothing wrong with arousing or feeling aroused, it's human for god's sake. It's what you do when aroused that's the issue. The thought of covering people in order to prevent the possibility of a feeling is the ultimate example of oppression.Newme wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2017 1:58 pmOne night around a bonfire, I asked this Jewish guy (from1smartdodog wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2017 5:29 am I think any religion that tries to compel women to hide their beauty to the public is not good. Both Mormons and muslims do that constantly. I think it is oppressive to women and controlling.
Israel) thinking similar to what you mentioned. He justified it as showing respect & honor to women, since men tend to be visual and easily turned on. I think it's a fair point, though I really feel for women wearing extra covering when it's really hot. My Muslim friend said it's entirely up to the woman - though she's coming from a western society Muslim group.
oliver_denom wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2017 2:52 pmThis is the same argument the church uses to justify its modesty teachings. What is that even based on? Even if it were true, that men are more aroused by sight, then why does that justify covering women? Why don't they make men wear blindfolds? There's nothing wrong with arousing or feeling aroused, it's human for god's sake. It's what you do when aroused that's the issue. The thought of covering people in order to prevent the possibility of a feeling is the ultimate example of oppression.Newme wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2017 1:58 pmOne night around a bonfire, I asked this Jewish guy (from1smartdodog wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2017 5:29 am I think any religion that tries to compel women to hide their beauty to the public is not good. Both Mormons and muslims do that constantly. I think it is oppressive to women and controlling.
Israel) thinking similar to what you mentioned. He justified it as showing respect & honor to women, since men tend to be visual and easily turned on. I think it's a fair point, though I really feel for women wearing extra covering when it's really hot. My Muslim friend said it's entirely up to the woman - though she's coming from a western society Muslim group.
But setting that aside...
I think most of us here understand what "choice" means within an orthodox religious context. You can choose to cover yourself, or you can choose to be shunned and ostracized. The choice isn't really a free one within the cultural context. That's not basis for honor and respect. You don't show anyone respect by taking their freedom.
The "honor and respect" is not respect for the human being. It is keeping sacred the baby making box. Respect for a human being sees their humanity first, not their sexuality first. So, they may "respect" a woman's virginity, but that is not respecting her. It is objectifying her, and then respecting an object. Whenever men make women cover up, they are not respecting her or honoring her. They are honoring the idea of female purity. Just look at what happens when a female " dishonors" her male kin by being human, they think they have the right to kill her for it. But they don't care about the man who "dishonors" the family name. Killing your sister because she decides to marry who she wants instead of who you want isn't respect and it isn't love. It is ownership. It is honoring the idea of female purity, not honoring a flesh and blood woman. So, they can claim it is about honor and respect, because they don't even see women as human beings. But, really, it is about control, about ownership, about purity.oliver_denom wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2017 2:52 pmThis is the same argument the church uses to justify its modesty teachings. What is that even based on? Even if it were true, that men are more aroused by sight, then why does that justify covering women? Why don't they make men wear blindfolds? There's nothing wrong with arousing or feeling aroused, it's human for god's sake. It's what you do when aroused that's the issue. The thought of covering people in order to prevent the possibility of a feeling is the ultimate example of oppression.Newme wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2017 1:58 pmOne night around a bonfire, I asked this Jewish guy (from1smartdodog wrote: ↑Thu Jun 29, 2017 5:29 am I think any religion that tries to compel women to hide their beauty to the public is not good. Both Mormons and muslims do that constantly. I think it is oppressive to women and controlling.
Israel) thinking similar to what you mentioned. He justified it as showing respect & honor to women, since men tend to be visual and easily turned on. I think it's a fair point, though I really feel for women wearing extra covering when it's really hot. My Muslim friend said it's entirely up to the woman - though she's coming from a western society Muslim group.
But setting that aside...
I think most of us here understand what "choice" means within an orthodox religious context. You can choose to cover yourself, or you can choose to be shunned and ostracized. The choice isn't really a free one within the cultural context. That's not basis for honor and respect. You don't show anyone respect by taking their freedom.