Is Immanuel really a name for Jesus?

Discussions toward a better understanding of LDS doctrine, history, and culture. Discussion of Christianity, religion, and faith in general is welcome.
Post Reply
Korihor
Posts: 1239
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 10:37 am

Is Immanuel really a name for Jesus?

Post by Korihor »

I know the scriptures prophecy of their "savior" being called Immanuel
Matt 1:23 Isaiah 7:14

But outside of these verses and a couple lip service quotes, Was he ever called Immanuel? Why does he have so

I don't understand how his name could be both Jesus and Immanuel? Why is Immanuel never actually used?

Also, the name of Jesus Christ and the name of TCOJCOLDS is kinda goofy.
It the same thing as The Church of Tommy The Awesome of Latter-Day Republicans

Did the JS just not understand words very well or does God have a hard time translating Adamic into English?
Reading can severely damage your ignorance.
User avatar
deacon blues
Posts: 2083
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:37 am

Re: Is Immanuel really a name for Jesus?

Post by deacon blues »

I'm reminded that the church changed its name a couple of times. No big deal, really, unless you believe in the BOM.
God is Love. God is Truth. The greatest problem with organized religion is that the organization becomes god, rather than a means of serving God.
User avatar
alas
Posts: 2405
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 2:10 pm

Re: Is Immanuel really a name for Jesus?

Post by alas »

Immanuel is not a name as much as it is another title. Like Christ means "King", Immanuel I think means "God with us" so it was a title meaning that Jesus was God incarnate.
User avatar
wtfluff
Posts: 3698
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:20 pm
Location: Worshiping Gravity / Pulling Taffy

Re: Is Immanuel really a name for Jesus?

Post by wtfluff »

This is how whoever wrote the gospels (since we don't actually know who they were) re-wrote "history" so that Jesus could fulfill some of the old-testament "prophecies", even though those prophecies had nothing to do with Jesus.

Instead of writing down actual history, they wrote down what they "thought" should have happened. That's why all of the gospels are so different, and that's why there are so many contradictions in the gospels
Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. -Frater Ravus

IDKSAF -RubinHighlander

Gave up who I am for who you wanted me to be...
User avatar
moksha
Posts: 5335
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:22 am

Re: Is Immanuel really a name for Jesus?

Post by moksha »

When Frodo became the ring-bearer, his name still was Frodo - even though he became the savior of Middle Earth. Hope that helps.

BTW, there is no truth to the rumor that once Frodo arrived in Valinor he changed his name to Irving.
Good faith does not require evidence, but it also does not turn a blind eye to that evidence. Otherwise, it becomes misplaced faith.
-- Moksha
asa
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 2:03 pm

Re: Is Immanuel really a name for Jesus?

Post by asa »

Alas is partially correct. The term Immanuel literally means in Hebrew "God with us" or "God among us". The"el" is the same grammatical element we see in Elohim or Michael meaning "God". Michael means literally one like unto God. Thus Immanuel is in the nature of a title not a personal name. The Savior could never have used that name as a personnel name because both he and his parents would have been Stoned to death for blasphemy. However Christ does not mean king. It is the Greek form of the Hebrew word ( Messiah) for anointed one. Each king of Israel was anointed by the prophet with oil and set apart for his new office. We continue that tradition in the West today. Queen Elizabeth II was anointed by the Archbishop of Canterbury when she became queen in 1953. If you watch the film you can see when it happens.
User avatar
GoodBoy
Posts: 410
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: Is Immanuel really a name for Jesus?

Post by GoodBoy »

moksha wrote: Thu Jun 01, 2017 7:00 pm When Frodo became the ring-bearer, his name still was Frodo - even though he became the savior of Middle Earth. Hope that helps.

BTW, there is no truth to the rumor that once Frodo arrived in Valinor he changed his name to Irving.
Moksha... you are awesome.

Jesus has so many different names because there were so many different prophesies and traditions that Jesus was force-fit into.
Always been the good kid, but I wanted to know more, and to find and test truth.
User avatar
Mad Jax
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 9:55 pm

Re: Is Immanuel really a name for Jesus?

Post by Mad Jax »

moksha wrote: Thu Jun 01, 2017 7:00 pm When Frodo became the ring-bearer, his name still was Frodo - even though he became the savior of Middle Earth. Hope that helps.

BTW, there is no truth to the rumor that once Frodo arrived in Valinor he changed his name to Irving.
I was excommunicated for following the Morgoth-Frodo Doctrine where the ring bearer was the incarnate being of the master of darkness.
Free will is a golden thread flowing through the matrix of fixed events.
User avatar
wtfluff
Posts: 3698
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:20 pm
Location: Worshiping Gravity / Pulling Taffy

Re: Is Immanuel really a name for Jesus?

Post by wtfluff »

GoodBoy wrote: Fri Jun 02, 2017 2:48 pm Jesus has so many different names because there were so many different prophesies and traditions that Jesus was force-fit into.
I love that sentence GoodBoy: "The New Testament: Force-Fit-Fulfillment of Prophecy and Tradition."
Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. -Frater Ravus

IDKSAF -RubinHighlander

Gave up who I am for who you wanted me to be...
Post Reply